- 8,485
- 1,318
i HATE lebron.. but the last 5 minutes of that game utterly ended this "argument"
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Originally Posted by DoubleJs07
Why do people keep bringing up Lebron's jumper like it's broke? Dude is one of the BEST in the NBA at the mid-range shot. He's the best player on the planet right now....and that's by a wide margin.
*Off hand, does anyone know Rose's FG% when Bron is guarding him?
Originally Posted by DoubleJs07
Why do people keep bringing up Lebron's jumper like it's broke? Dude is one of the BEST in the NBA at the mid-range shot. He's the best player on the planet right now....and that's by a wide margin.
*Off hand, does anyone know Rose's FG% when Bron is guarding him?
Originally Posted by 651akathePaul
It was most evident last night when Lebron locked up on Rose that even though they're both great players, Rose just isn't on Lebron's level.Originally Posted by wiseman299
First never compare Bayless to anyone Bayless is the worst ever. Without Woody silly self on 1st n 10 there is no balance, they should def fire him or get Woody back. None the less what he said isn't that off it's just what type of player you prefer. So let’s compare them; both are fast, strong, got hops, can pass, defense about even, and are streaky shooters at best. To me D Rose is more fearless/ has more heart and Lebron is bigger therefore harder to match up with. So it depends on what you prefer heart or size.
Originally Posted by 651akathePaul
It was most evident last night when Lebron locked up on Rose that even though they're both great players, Rose just isn't on Lebron's level.Originally Posted by wiseman299
First never compare Bayless to anyone Bayless is the worst ever. Without Woody silly self on 1st n 10 there is no balance, they should def fire him or get Woody back. None the less what he said isn't that off it's just what type of player you prefer. So let’s compare them; both are fast, strong, got hops, can pass, defense about even, and are streaky shooters at best. To me D Rose is more fearless/ has more heart and Lebron is bigger therefore harder to match up with. So it depends on what you prefer heart or size.
Originally Posted by DoubleJs07
Why do people keep bringing up Lebron's jumper like it's broke? Dude is one of the BEST in the NBA at the mid-range shot. He's the best player on the planet right now....and that's by a wide margin.
*Off hand, does anyone know Rose's FG% when Bron is guarding him?
Originally Posted by DoubleJs07
Why do people keep bringing up Lebron's jumper like it's broke? Dude is one of the BEST in the NBA at the mid-range shot. He's the best player on the planet right now....and that's by a wide margin.
*Off hand, does anyone know Rose's FG% when Bron is guarding him?
Originally Posted by ATGD7154xBBxMZ
Better @ jacking up more shots? Yeah/
I'd take Dwight over both.
Originally Posted by ATGD7154xBBxMZ
Better @ jacking up more shots? Yeah/
I'd take Dwight over both.
thank god you won't be a gmOriginally Posted by Rebourne
If I had the choice to pick as a franchise player for my team, I'd pick D-Rose, hands down!!!
thank god you won't be a gmOriginally Posted by Rebourne
If I had the choice to pick as a franchise player for my team, I'd pick D-Rose, hands down!!!
Originally Posted by Rebourne
If I had the choice to pick as a franchise player for my team, I'd pick D-Rose, hands down!!!
Originally Posted by Rebourne
If I had the choice to pick as a franchise player for my team, I'd pick D-Rose, hands down!!!
Originally Posted by Xtapolapacetl
Originally Posted by Rebourne
If I had the choice to pick as a franchise player for my team, I'd pick D-Rose, hands down!!!
If I had the choice to pick the dumbest comment of this thread, it would be this one, hands down!!!
Originally Posted by Xtapolapacetl
Originally Posted by Rebourne
If I had the choice to pick as a franchise player for my team, I'd pick D-Rose, hands down!!!
If I had the choice to pick the dumbest comment of this thread, it would be this one, hands down!!!
Originally Posted by Nako XL
Originally Posted by LuketheJediKnight
"You're making my point: Player A v.s Player B debates are stupid because most of the time there's no empirical way to compare them. The two play different positions."
I understand where you're getting at, but this is false. Positions in basketball are simply a means to an end, and that is to help your team score more points the other team. You can directly show which players help their teams in this regard more than other players (accounting for several importan factors in the game of course).
Rose is a great player and has propelled himself into the top ranks of the NBA's best, but the best player in the league? This isn't supported by evidence. Saying that it's "all opinion" is to disregard the evidence at hand that says he isn't playing better than LBJ, Wade, D12, etc.
But by your reasoning D12 might be the best player in the world...
People argued Shaq was more dominant/important than Jordan. You can't say something like a position is just a means to an end in helping scoring because that's not true at all.
Players are more skilled at certain aspects of the game. Some people harp on stats, some people consider skills and what a player shows on the court as the best indicator of how good a player is. Superstars lose head to head matchups to other superstars all the time. It doesn't mean anything definite.
It's easy to say "well lebron stops d. rose from scoring more often than naught, so that should be enough" when the bulls run a 1v 5 iso and Lebron is 6'8" and has Udonis Haslem, Mike Miller, Chris Bosh, and Dwyane Wade behind him.
I don't even think D. Rose is the better player, but these debates bother me because they're so silly.
Originally Posted by Nako XL
Originally Posted by LuketheJediKnight
"You're making my point: Player A v.s Player B debates are stupid because most of the time there's no empirical way to compare them. The two play different positions."
I understand where you're getting at, but this is false. Positions in basketball are simply a means to an end, and that is to help your team score more points the other team. You can directly show which players help their teams in this regard more than other players (accounting for several importan factors in the game of course).
Rose is a great player and has propelled himself into the top ranks of the NBA's best, but the best player in the league? This isn't supported by evidence. Saying that it's "all opinion" is to disregard the evidence at hand that says he isn't playing better than LBJ, Wade, D12, etc.
But by your reasoning D12 might be the best player in the world...
People argued Shaq was more dominant/important than Jordan. You can't say something like a position is just a means to an end in helping scoring because that's not true at all.
Players are more skilled at certain aspects of the game. Some people harp on stats, some people consider skills and what a player shows on the court as the best indicator of how good a player is. Superstars lose head to head matchups to other superstars all the time. It doesn't mean anything definite.
It's easy to say "well lebron stops d. rose from scoring more often than naught, so that should be enough" when the bulls run a 1v 5 iso and Lebron is 6'8" and has Udonis Haslem, Mike Miller, Chris Bosh, and Dwyane Wade behind him.
I don't even think D. Rose is the better player, but these debates bother me because they're so silly.