- 3,453
- 2,970
she would look like your typical NY chick in team jordans.I ain't gon lie tho. If Dwight shaved his face clean, son would have a nice lookin female face forreal forreal.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
she would look like your typical NY chick in team jordans.I ain't gon lie tho. If Dwight shaved his face clean, son would have a nice lookin female face forreal forreal.
He only went far enough back to make a point. Mandingos being forced to fight each other to the death for the amusement and entertainment of white ppl.Yep they also love seeing big black guys playing in arenas for their amusement. [COLOR=#red]It dates back to mandingo fighting, you should boycott all sports it's all rooted in slavery.[/COLOR]
But nah, you only focus on the dresses. TEE HEE.
Actually it goes back to the ancient world of the Maccabean period with Antiochus Epiphanes and Jerusalem being "hellenized"
Read the left hand side of the convo and immediately thought this gotta be the girl. Saw the right hand side and realized it was the other way around.
Dwight sounding softer than most females I know. "I told you things......"
Dwight prolly told her his secret hiding spot
If ima risk jail time she gotta look better than this.
All the legal bad ******* in the world and this is what Dwight settles on
Hoping she comes back pregnant
Man, yall cruel. Poor girl gonna hang herself now
Dawg....lmao.
Even if he didn't smash why...WHY would you be caught in a hotel room with two blatanly underaged females? Dude's an idiot.
I ain't gon lie tho. If Dwight shaved his face clean, son would have a nice lookin female face forreal forreal.
This young girls confidence is going to be shot, with people going in on her looks
Exactly...ehh but she's the one that put the information out there.
Fixed
I ain't gon lie tho. If Dwight shaved his face clean, son would have a nice lookin female face forreal forreal.
she would look like your typicalNY chickBronx ******s in team jordans.
thot faceThis her?
Did you try to compare sporting events to madingo fighting?? Either way in regards to your last statement, there seems to be a "push" to see black men in dresses on TV.
Actually yes I did. But I'm surprised as someone who sees racial propaganda in everything you can't see this. Or maybe you simply refuse to because making a tackle is a lot cooler than the comedy of cross dressing.
Now let's examine this...Dwight Howard is wealthy and a Jokestar. If he as a black man didn't CHOOSE to do this himself, how much do you think he was paid to do this? In history black people WILL be the poster boys for homophobia if they are not careful. We look back in history and ridicule white people for ideal that were commonplace during that time. I see the same thing happening in out generation.
Accusers are just accusers. Where's your proof?Lol yea right
No wonder why you dont believe dwight did it
You prolly think 911 was a conspiracy tho right?
I never said Dwight didn't do it.
But where do you get the idea MJ's accusers came out and said they they lied about the allegations ? ... Please show me a single verifiable news source that can confirm.
No body can provide a verifiable news source because it does not exist. I've read the same thing so many times and even looked up many of these links. They lead to small time blogs and tabloids "reporting on reports". You'd be seriously delusional to think mainstream press would not have devoured any of this story if there was even an ounce of fact in it, but you will not find it anywhere on CNN, NY Times, even TMZ.
Nobody in here has arrested and convicted Dwight so they can make fun of him for their assumptions all they want. Same way ppl make fun of MJ even though he hasn't been charged or convicted either.
Yall dudes really do tend to make these leaps in declarations for other ppl to feign this condescending judgements.
You didn't compare them in the right way though. You said ppl talking in this thread like Dwight is already guilty but defend MJ. I'm saying neither have been charged but ppl will still joke on them if they want to which ppl consistently do with MJ. There are ppl that straight up believe he's guilty. So don't pretend ppl don't. If you want to ask those who ask for proof when MJ is brought up why they don't with Dwight that'd be a whole different matter but you're not doing that.Accusers are just accusers. Where's your proof?Lol yea right
No wonder why you dont believe dwight did it
You prolly think 911 was a conspiracy tho right?
I never said Dwight didn't do it.
But where do you get the idea MJ's accusers came out and said they they lied about the allegations ? ... Please show me a single verifiable news source that can confirm.
No body can provide a verifiable news source because it does not exist. I've read the same thing so many times and even looked up many of these links. They lead to small time blogs and tabloids "reporting on reports". You'd be seriously delusional to think mainstream press would not have devoured any of this story if there was even an ounce of fact in it, but you will not find it anywhere on CNN, NY Times, even TMZ.
Nobody in here has arrested and convicted Dwight so they can make fun of him for their assumptions all they want. Same way ppl make fun of MJ even though he hasn't been charged or convicted either.
Yall dudes really do tend to make these leaps in declarations for other ppl to feign this condescending judgements.
Sit down... Comparing the allegations against Dwight to those against MJ isn't a stretch.
You didn't compare them in the right way though. You said ppl talking in this thread like Dwight is already guilty but defend MJ. I'm saying neither have been charged but ppl will still joke on them if they want to which ppl consistently do with MJ. There are ppl that straight up believe he's guilty. So don't pretend ppl don't. If you want to ask those who ask for proof when MJ is brought up why they don't with Dwight that'd be a whole different matter but you're not doing that.Accusers are just accusers. Where's your proof?Lol yea right
No wonder why you dont believe dwight did it
You prolly think 911 was a conspiracy tho right?
I never said Dwight didn't do it.
But where do you get the idea MJ's accusers came out and said they they lied about the allegations ? ... Please show me a single verifiable news source that can confirm.
No body can provide a verifiable news source because it does not exist. I've read the same thing so many times and even looked up many of these links. They lead to small time blogs and tabloids "reporting on reports". You'd be seriously delusional to think mainstream press would not have devoured any of this story if there was even an ounce of fact in it, but you will not find it anywhere on CNN, NY Times, even TMZ.
Nobody in here has arrested and convicted Dwight so they can make fun of him for their assumptions all they want. Same way ppl make fun of MJ even though he hasn't been charged or convicted either.
Yall dudes really do tend to make these leaps in declarations for other ppl to feign this condescending judgements.
Sit down... Comparing the allegations against Dwight to those against MJ isn't a stretch.
You need to sit down and think about why you decided to throw MJ's name in to this in the first place. These situations aint equal.
If you think my post said comparing Dwight's allegations and MJ's is a stretch I suggest you reread it again until you fully comprehend it.
What the hell happened in this thread?
Hence, you being wrong…. about ppl who defend MJ and ppl talking about Dwight like he's already guilty based off an assumption.You didn't compare them in the right way though. You said ppl talking in this thread like Dwight is already guilty but defend MJ. I'm saying neither have been charged but ppl will still joke on them if they want to which ppl consistently do with MJ. There are ppl that straight up believe he's guilty. So don't pretend ppl don't. If you want to ask those who ask for proof when MJ is brought up why they don't with Dwight that'd be a whole different matter but you're not doing that.Accusers are just accusers. Where's your proof?Lol yea right
No wonder why you dont believe dwight did it
You prolly think 911 was a conspiracy tho right?
I never said Dwight didn't do it.
But where do you get the idea MJ's accusers came out and said they they lied about the allegations ? ... Please show me a single verifiable news source that can confirm.
No body can provide a verifiable news source because it does not exist. I've read the same thing so many times and even looked up many of these links. They lead to small time blogs and tabloids "reporting on reports". You'd be seriously delusional to think mainstream press would not have devoured any of this story if there was even an ounce of fact in it, but you will not find it anywhere on CNN, NY Times, even TMZ.
Nobody in here has arrested and convicted Dwight so they can make fun of him for their assumptions all they want. Same way ppl make fun of MJ even though he hasn't been charged or convicted either.
Yall dudes really do tend to make these leaps in declarations for other ppl to feign this condescending judgements.
Sit down... Comparing the allegations against Dwight to those against MJ isn't a stretch.
You need to sit down and think about why you decided to throw MJ's name in to this in the first place. These situations aint equal.
If you think my post said comparing Dwight's allegations and MJ's is a stretch I suggest you reread it again until you fully comprehend it.
Compare it in the right way ?
Sit down bruh.... Ill compare these two any way I want.
You'd be clearly wrong given plenty ppl on NT crucify MJ. People being reedy to crucify Dwight has nothing to do with him actually being guilty or not. People will always be ready to jump to a conclusion given what little info they have, especially on the internet.What the hell happened in this thread?
I said NT ready to crucify Dwight, but swear up and down Michael Jackson didn't do anything. Now these fools are just proving me right.
There's no reach involved. You're just reestablishing your misunderstanding.^ Sit down bruh... You're trying way too hard to make this into something more than it is.
When someone refers to "NT", they obviously don't mean every single NTer on site. Quit reaching
There's no reach involved. You're just reestablishing your misunderstanding.^ Sit down bruh... You're trying way too hard to make this into something more than it is.
When someone refers to "NT", they obviously don't mean every single NTer on site. Quit reaching
"Trying too hard", "sit down". C'mon you wasn't really saying anything to begin with.
You're repeating yourself so much you don't even have a point anymore Once I addressed that nonsensical post you moved on to this.There's no reach involved. You're just reestablishing your misunderstanding.^ Sit down bruh... You're trying way too hard to make this into something more than it is.
When someone refers to "NT", they obviously don't mean every single NTer on site. Quit reaching
"Trying too hard", "sit down". C'mon you wasn't really saying anything to begin with.
Bruh... you're trying way too hard and really need to sit down.