- 6,227
- 2,339
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2007
Originally Posted by 22 Rather Unique 22
I didn't answer your question because it was irrelevant.Originally Posted by Krazyrodzilla
Typing too fastOriginally Posted by 22 Rather Unique 22
1) PAUSE.Originally Posted by Krazyrodzilla
Like I said wasn't even close. See what happen after that. That wasn't a foul. Brent even throw up it all late. So, you think they're gonna beat us (if they make it deep into the playoffs) this year? I HIGHLY DOUBT IT! If they do meat, it'll be the 5th time Kobe knocked Ducan out the playoffs.Originally Posted by 22 Rather Unique 22
Originally Posted by Krazyrodzilla
Originally Posted by 22 Rather Unique 22
Originally Posted by Krazyrodzilla
Originally Posted by 22 Rather Unique 22
Both players in their prime, Duncan is the easy answer.
He's not a drama queen, and gets the job done. Period.
Um......EASY huh? Didn't Kobe and the Lakers knock Ducan and Spurs out the playoffs 4 times last decade with the most recent being 2008.
The question was who would you take first to start a team.
And let's not forget about that non-call that shifted the whole series in 2008.
C'mon Son there you go making excuses. Wasn't even close that series. Spurs really don't have a chance now a days. So, your argument just going to get worst and worst.
What wasn't close? The Spurs got shafted. If Brent Barry gets the call, he makes all 3 free throws. If the Spurs win in overtime, it's 2-2.
Wasn't even close?@%!% outta here.
2)
3) Go to school, dude. Your grammar is horrific.Anyways. Um........ didn't answer my question, just like I thought
I said I'd take Tim Duncan in his prime over Kobe in his prime.
Kobe is still in his prime, Duncan isn't.
So what you asked really doesn't apply here.
And the Lakers are STACKED this year, so what is your point?
Kobe is seen as the better player now and will def be seen as a better player when both of their careers are over.