- 9,086
- 11
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2006
It all starts to make sense now.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Originally Posted by Im Not You
Originally Posted by BangDak
stop with the pyramids please? its making this page look alot longer then it actually is...
and haywood is not garbage like you make him seem. with a HEALTHY agent 0 and haywood inserted back into the starting lineup, that team is straight up
im not from dc, but im pretty sure anyone would rejoice if mcgee could play. who wouldnt want a talented young center to backup their starting center?
I guarantee you if polled everybody in this area who they would want to start RIGHT NOW...McGee would come out on top. Even when he came back at the end of the season people in the stands were mad as hell when he started taking McGee's minutes. He's still raw around the edges but he's already talented enough to start over Haywood. Haywood's a bum...he only got his starting job back when that other bum Etan got hurt.
These guys aren't showcasing their athleticism? Do you know how difficult it is for undersized (with the exception of Ray Ray) SG's tonumerous contested jumpers and hardly ever get blocked? That's pretty impressive to meOriginally Posted by I NaSmatic I
As far as the Ben Gordon, Ray Allen and Eric Gordon athleticism talk goes, it's not that they aren't very good athletically speaking (because they are).
It's just that they don't showcase or rely on their athleticism like other players. Just me though.
I'll put it this way...Originally Posted by Im Not You
Personally...at the end of the day I just believe if you give him the same minutes right now as Haywood has gotten as a starter...he'll give you the same numbers and this is with him being as raw as he is. Peep the games he plays at least 20 minutes...and compare this to Haywoods career output
http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/players/4480/gamelog;_ylt=A2KIRzOpLyhKTS4AbArdPaB4
Ben Gordon really doesn't use his athleticism.
this is 100% FACT
and why are the wiz giving up on Nick Young?
this is 100% FACT
Originally Posted by I NaSmatic I
Regarding the Raptors:
We had DeMar DeRozan going to Toronto with the ninth pick in our latest mock draft.
Don't expect him to slip past there. League sources say the Raptors have let DeRozan know that if he's there at nine they're taking him.
Source
We've learned that the Knicks have Holiday and Curry ahead of Evans, because they feel that they are more suited at the point guard position, but the Memphis product will work out for the Knicks as well as the Kings, Wizards and Raptors with Toronto keeping their fingers crossed that he falls to 9. No chance he gets past the Raptors, who have all but guaranteed Evans' camp.
Source
Nothing is a guarantee.Originally Posted by PharelFor3
Originally Posted by I NaSmatic I
Regarding the Raptors:
We had DeMar DeRozan going to Toronto with the ninth pick in our latest mock draft.
Don't expect him to slip past there. League sources say the Raptors have let DeRozan know that if he's there at nine they're taking him.
Source
We've learned that the Knicks have Holiday and Curry ahead of Evans, because they feel that they are more suited at the point guard position, but the Memphis product will work out for the Knicks as well as the Kings, Wizards and Raptors with Toronto keeping their fingers crossed that he falls to 9. No chance he gets past the Raptors, who have all but guaranteed Evans' camp.
Source
so wait, the raptors guaranteed their spot to 2 diff playuers. Watch em not draft either.
Originally Posted by Nowitness41Dirk
I still say put in the tape and watch the game... This same thing happens with the NFL, where guys go and workout well, and what you've seen for 3 and 4 years on the court gets brushed over... There's a reason people didn't/don't think Tyler Hansbrough is an NBA caliber athlete... And it's because those test results don't translate to the court when he's banging with guys in traffic...
Originally Posted by bhzmafia14
What's this rumored deal going around about Memphis trading Jaric and no.2 pick for Martin and no.4 pick? With that assumption, it would mean Memphis would be moving OJ to the point. From the Kings standpoint, they would be building around Rubio, Thompson and Hawes. Moving Martin for Jaric saves them almost $7 million over the next 2 seasons and then $25 million in 2011-2012 when they would be able to be free agent players and take on salary again.
I don't know how true this rumor is, but its coming from the Kings side. I just heard about it though. IMO, this still wouldn't fix the Grizz PF problem and how well would OJ and Rudy be able to adjust having a scoring SG like Martin on the perimeter? OJ would probably have an easier time adjusting than Rudy.
Would the Grizzlies still be under the cap if they took Martin's contract? I like that Martin would bring perimeter shooting and doesn'tneed to dominate the ball to score, but I don't know if Martin, Mayo and Gay could work. That's unless they're shopping Gay for a PFOriginally Posted by bhzmafia14
What's this rumored deal going around about Memphis trading Jaric and no.2 pick for Martin and no.4 pick? With that assumption, it would mean Memphis would be moving OJ to the point. From the Kings standpoint, they would be building around Rubio, Thompson and Hawes. Moving Martin for Jaric saves them almost $7 million over the next 2 seasons and then $25 million in 2011-2012 when they would be able to be free agent players and take on salary again.
I don't know how true this rumor is, but its coming from the Kings side. I just heard about it though. IMO, this still wouldn't fix the Grizz PF problem and how well would OJ and Rudy be able to adjust having a scoring SG like Martin on the perimeter? OJ would probably have an easier time adjusting than Rudy.
Originally Posted by I NaSmatic I
Would the Grizzlies still be under the cap if they took Martin's contract? I like that Martin would bring perimeter shooting and doesn't need to dominate the ball to score, but I don't know if Martin, Mayo and Gay could work. That's unless they're shopping Gay for a PFOriginally Posted by bhzmafia14
What's this rumored deal going around about Memphis trading Jaric and no.2 pick for Martin and no.4 pick? With that assumption, it would mean Memphis would be moving OJ to the point. From the Kings standpoint, they would be building around Rubio, Thompson and Hawes. Moving Martin for Jaric saves them almost $7 million over the next 2 seasons and then $25 million in 2011-2012 when they would be able to be free agent players and take on salary again.
I don't know how true this rumor is, but its coming from the Kings side. I just heard about it though. IMO, this still wouldn't fix the Grizz PF problem and how well would OJ and Rudy be able to adjust having a scoring SG like Martin on the perimeter? OJ would probably have an easier time adjusting than Rudy..
Maybe they're gonna trade conley + the 4 for a PF
I was thinking that too, but Memphis would have to keep Conley for a 3-guard rotation of OJ/Conley/Martin. If OJ were to come over to the PG slot,he would probably be turnover prone along with Martin. Keeping Conley might be the best option, but that team offensively would be. I just don't see Sacramento just doing a deal so simple likethat for Martin. I would think Memphis would have to add Darko's expiring and/or 27th pick as well.