Let me clarify.
If the fixed interest rate on a Stafford loan is 4.66%, for private lenders to charge 8%--especially when I deposit my funds in the bank from which I receive the loan--is usurious. But it doesn't end there. As a number of folks in this thread have mentioned, student debtors have watched the interest on their loans accumulate by 25K in a single year! Others have paid 20K towards the interest while the principal stood still.
Your characterization of laptops, iphones, cars, and 1-bedroom apartments as luxury goods says less about the so-called "asinine" living standards of borrowers than it does about the inculcation of elitist ideology. Either you are a member of the 1% or you function as the working-middle class mouth-piece for those elites who have profited from the very arguments you hold deal. In your posts there is no mention of the irresponsible consumption patterns of elites. No mention of how the ability to legally get around paying taxes produces a regressive system of taxation that falls heavily on debtors. Your posts amount to a narrative of "spoiled" borrowers, who, had they traveled (how could they when in perpetual indebtedness?), would learn to be happy with non-luxury goods.
Where you and I differ is in how we understand debt. For you, debt is primarily a moral story. Had students displayed the grit and work ethic common in other countries and in earlier times, there would be no need to secure private loans at higher interest rates. Had graduates moved back in with their parents, put off luxury purchases, and displayed "self responsibility," debt would be extinguished. Of course, as a recent NY Federal Reserve report notes, college graduates
are giving up dreams of 1-bedrooms and moving back in with their parents (
http://www.newyorkfed.org/research/staff_reports/sr700.html).
By contrast, I understand indebtedness as a power relationship. From the deliberate practices by financial institutions to grant credit to subprime borrowers to loans made to Greece by the Troika, from the dicing up and obfuscation of student loans to the the stream of income debt provides to creditors, debt--mortgage, government, student, consumer--enables control. No matter how moral your compass, there is no end to indebtedness. It is infinite.
If debt is about power, it is essential for the growing number of debtors to think strategically about how to contest the chains of bondage.