everysingletime
formerly amel223
- 42,963
- 15,346
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2006
Just realized. She said she gave up on man for a century. That must mean she's had a century of lesbian conquests
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
She said at the end that she retired from the world 100 years ago.
It's WWI thoughIf she was able to actively participate in WWI and not become internationally recognized I wouldn't trip too hard about her being low-key the rest of the time
Good point.Batman and Superman shouldn't killing people because it removes the moral complexity of the characters.
So many thematic elements are complete undercut by killing people.
So when the Joker appears trying to get Batman to break his one rule, the thematic tension is completly undercut. If he's a murderer already.
Batman and Superman shouldn't be killing anyone, under almost any circumstances.
it was not explained at all but in all honesty it makes more sense for lex to know about darkseid because of his interaction with the ship than for batman to randomly dream about him
Can anyone confirm how Lex knew about Darkseid (which he alluded to in jail)?
I'm gonna assume it was when he was in Zod's ship and the voiceover told him it has knowledge of all the other worlds/planets.
The exact same way i felt about this movieJUST WATCHED MOVIE.
PROBABLY THE BEST SUPERHERO MOVIE I'VE EVER SEEN AFTER CAPTAIN AMERICA WINTER SOLDIER.
WENT IN SPOILER FREE. LEFT AMAZED.
WONDER WOMAN WAS AMAZING IN LOOKS AND SKILLS
I defintiely caught the whole "You killed Lois so I will rip a hole in your torso" but instead of Joker, it's the BatsI've never played Injustice but I've read that the Flash scene might have been inspired by the game.
i didnt grow up on DC comics so i dont feel as strongly about this as you doBatman and Superman shouldn't killing people because it removes the moral complexity of the characters.
So many thematic elements are complete undercut by killing people.
So when the Joker appears trying to get Batman to break his one rule, the thematic tension is completly undercut. If he's a murderer already.
Batman and Superman shouldn't be killing anyone, under almost any circumstances.
i didnt grow up on DC comics so i dont feel as strongly about this as you doBatman and Superman shouldn't killing people because it removes the moral complexity of the characters.
So many thematic elements are complete undercut by killing people.
So when the Joker appears trying to get Batman to break his one rule, the thematic tension is completly undercut. If he's a murderer already.
Batman and Superman shouldn't be killing anyone, under almost any circumstances.
but this is a good point in how no killing rules as a character trait can make for a more interesting dynamic between heroes and villains.
now every time batman meets the joker we are left wondering why he doesnt just kill him on the spot
Did we really need like 5 slow-mo cuts of the gun breaking the pearl necklace???
3 slow-mos of the bullet shell hitting the ground?
How about the Gladiator-esqe walking in the grass?
So, can we talk about how this "fight" is really just Batman beating the **** out of Superman?