- 1,785
- 231
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2005
Aside from Pippen, MJ, and Rodman, name 5 players from the 90's era that can consistently lock down Lebron on the wing.
BTW I'm not even a Lebron fan.
BTW I'm not even a Lebron fan.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Originally Posted by MeloManFan
Aside from Pippen, MJ, and Rodman, name 5 players from the 90's era that can consistently lock down Lebron on the wing.
BTW I'm not even a Lebron fan.
Originally Posted by Futuristic
I forgot to address that he said MJ was 240 pounds...
If by give Bron fits you mean that it would take him 20 shots to get 30 points then sure, I agree.Originally Posted by 23ska909red02
^ First off, Lebron is a freak, no doubt, so I don't feel comfortable saying anyone would "consistently lock down" the guy.
HOWEVA... the following would definitely give him fits on the perimeter:
- Blaylock
- Glove
- Stockton (go ahead and laugh at the height disadvantage of the players named so far; all you're doing is showing your limited understanding of the game)
And you got guys like AC Green and Michael Cooper that would give him fits the same way a guy like Shane Battier gives fits to perimeter players today.
I'd love to see offensive Lebron play defensive Charles Oakley, though.
Glove, maybe.Originally Posted by 23ska909red02
HOWEVA... the following would definitely give him fits on the perimeter:
- Blaylock
- Glove
- Stockton (go ahead and laugh at the height disadvantage of the players named so far; all you're doing is showing your limited understanding of the game)
dreClark:
If the basis of your argument is that players would be allowed to be more physical with Lebron then how can you ignore the converse, which is the fact that Lebron would be allowed to be more physical on offense and not worry about offensive fouls as much?
And lets stop acting like charges were created in 2002.
Who? Me?
The basis of my argument has nothing to do w/ players being more physical on Bron or Bron being more physical on them or physicality being more now or more then or anything like that.
Tayshaun has never been accused of being too physical, but he had a stretch where he was definitely among the most respected defenders in the game.
So when you mentioned GP, Stock, and Blaylock...you were referring to some otherworldly ball denial skills that somehow, with evolution, no one in the NBA currently possesses? I'm almost positive LeBron can get the ball whenever he wants...the only thing he's ever been criticized for, and has been somewhat overblown, are his performances in crunchtime. I've never once heard someone say, "It's easy to deny him the ball." But I guess when you add some sub 6'4 PGs into the equation, LeBron would have trouble getting the rock. Makes a lot of senseOriginally Posted by 23ska909red02
So now ball denial is out the window.
What other facets of defense can be thrown out the window next?
Because defense in basketball is strictly about size... which makes me scratch my head how Tayshaun Prince had a nice little run at great defense... weighing in at 38 lbs.
It is worth considering. The numbers are practically the same now vs then (& schematically - I really have no doubt that it has advanced). But the nostalgia factor and the era of 'hard nosed basketball' will not allow people in our age group to even consider it.Originally Posted by gangsta207therevolution
I think that Defense has come a long way since MJ's era.
Sometimes I think the athleticism factor, which I do believe has improved, gets overblown and that today's technology and advanced statistics don't get mentioned enough. Technology + advanced statistics, trends, etc. really makes a difference. I do cringe at the thought of Pippen having access to the info Battier gets provided before each of his gamesOriginally Posted by Al3xis
It is worth considering. The numbers are practically the same now vs then (& schematically - I really have no doubt that it has advanced). But the nostalgia factor and the era of 'hard nosed basketball' will not allow people in our age group to even consider it.Originally Posted by gangsta207therevolution
I think that Defense has come a long way since MJ's era.
But this era of guys are more skilled than the 90's. I mean stop and think about it, a guy with JR Smith's tools would be a legit #2 scoring option ill regardless of his other issues.Originally Posted by Al3xis
It is worth considering. The numbers are practically the same now vs then (& schematically - I really have no doubt that it has advanced). But the nostalgia factor and the era of 'hard nosed basketball' will not allow people in our age group to even consider it.Originally Posted by gangsta207therevolution
I think that Defense has come a long way since MJ's era.
+1 to everything you're saying...I always tell my friends that JR Smith's talent is off the charts at times.Originally Posted by gangsta207therevolution
But this era of guys are more skilled than the 90's. I mean stop and think about it, a guy with JR Smith's tools would be a legit #2 scoring option ill regardless of his other issues.Originally Posted by Al3xis
It is worth considering. The numbers are practically the same now vs then (& schematically - I really have no doubt that it has advanced). But the nostalgia factor and the era of 'hard nosed basketball' will not allow people in our age group to even consider it.Originally Posted by gangsta207therevolution
I think that Defense has come a long way since MJ's era.
As of now he is a bench spark plug.
Schematically on both ends the game has advanced.
The Nostalgia the players and media portray doesn't help matters. To me the other thing is the way Midrange shots are defended. I dont think Mike gets single coverage on the post as often as he did. I think while he would be able to move better his athletic ability wouldn't be as stunning. I think he would find himself being guided to particular spots more often than he thinks, not with physicality but simply with presence.
Damn! Oak would eat him for breakfast, lunch and dinner! The Bad Boys would feast on Bron too. Barkley, Rodman and Malone too. But I think Bron would adjust to that and learn from it like MJ did.Originally Posted by 23ska909red02
I'd love to see offensive Lebron play defensive Charles Oakley, though.
Originally Posted by ohboydanny
Originally Posted by Night Marcher01
Originally Posted by 4318MichaelJohnson4318
Kinda a spin off on the illegal defense/mj era the easiest thread. I feel if Lebron could use his body more in defense he would benefit a lot. He is bigger than most of the guys and if he could actually use that as an advantage he would be unstoppable on the defensive end. Add the hand checking and plus his blocking he probably would have been a top defensive player of all time.
Flame suit on
They still had 4th quarters in MJ's era, though. See how pointless that was? Just like this thread.
http://www.****younerds.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/michael_jordan.gif