- 72,656
- 116,620
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2011
View media item 2058812I don't care what celebrity or how many celebrities wear those 750 Yeezy's, those joints are T R A S H. Take away that name, joints are sitting on the shelves until they hit that $30 tag.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
View media item 2058812I don't care what celebrity or how many celebrities wear those 750 Yeezy's, those joints are T R A S H. Take away that name, joints are sitting on the shelves until they hit that $30 tag.
i thought that trend was dead.
not wit broads at cookouts that think she got higher morals than da next skankz cuz she got that fit, with gladiator sandals, and da floppy Sunday morning church hat.
Take away the name argument is hilarious.
Take away the Jordan name and let his shoes stand on their own
It really isn't though. Plenty of Jordans that looked a bit out there that wouldn't have sold whatsoever if not for Mike's name...Horrible comparison.
750's are absolute garbage. Look like some Zara x Supra joints.
agreed, they are peoples grails and collectibles because of mike and his influenceIt really isn't though. Plenty of Jordans that looked a bit out there that wouldn't have sold whatsoever if not for Mike's name...
8s, 9s, 15s...like?
im not disagreeing with your opinion b sox just wondering which ones you think.....
a lot of jordans were the first to use certain innovations.....yeezys not so much.
8s, 9s, 15, s
agreed, they are peoples grails and collectibles because of mike and his influence
square up fam8s, 9s, 15s...like?
im not disagreeing with your opinion b sox just wondering which ones you think.....
a lot of jordans were the first to use certain innovations.....yeezys not so much.
I like 8s personally. I was just talking about pairs in which the design looked a bit out there.square up fam
#RIP Kimbo