- 1,066
- 598
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2014
I went a half size down on the hares thinking they'd run big but should've gone tts. Wont make the same mistake on these
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Nah, I'd say TTS. The C&C pack seem to fit most people slightly more snug. I've copped three VII's this year and I haven't wore any beyond just trying on
but, C&C do have more of an inner "grip" than my other two pairs. If these are like hares though, which I'd imagine, normal size should do just fine.
Shape on the 2011's means comfort is poor. Its more then just looks. Trust, ppl raving bout ares being comfy, where as my cdps are ****house. And that's due to shape
damn. I'm easily pleased i guess. I thought my 11's were some of the most comfortable Jordans I have.
I know both those and Olympics dropped in recent years but, I was hoping like hell They'd re-release this year. At least charcoals with better color and shape.
Definitely. Those saying they look purplish must not know the true hue of Bordeaux. Or at least seen a wine bottle of it. It is dark, rich, and does have a purplish tint to it, which is why I appreciate the color on these.
I know both those and Olympics dropped in recent years but, I was hoping like hell They'd re-release this year. At least charcoals with better color and shape.
Yes. 2011's were not tts. My 9.5 looks like a Subway sandwich on foot. Not mad at the comfort but the shape was horrid.do you guys really notice the shape on feet?
looks like they'll not crease but wrinkle
Reminds me of the toe on the reebok kamikaze 1 retro. Look like homies toes on big trouble in little china when dude gets pissed they killed lopan
It's crazy because they almost look like two different shoes IMO . Either way I can tell the 2015's will look good on my feet.
see8ng the comparisons... I like the shape and colors of the 2011s better
http://www.complex.com/sneakers/2015/07/air-jordan-vii-bordeaux-retro-2015-release-date
the quality on these really making me question if they are remastered smh
You were either wealthy growing up, or you're older than me and had a job since '89. Or you're on of the guys who started swoopin' up OG's once the retros became all the rage ('99-present).Thats a lie lol all of my viis including my 2011 bordeaux are comfortable and so are my cdp hares
Shape has nothing to do with it
My remastered chicago x is the only x to ever hurt my foot and thats because they remastered the shape to curve inwards from the back. They tried to mimmick the og x but went a lil to inwards. Although no vii will ever have this problem because of the huarache bootie
And ive had ogs of every jordan models iv and up
That's ridiculous.
You were either wealthy growing up, or you're older than me and had a job since '89. Or you're on of the guys who started swoopin' up OG's once the retros became all the rage ('99-present).
I never heard of anyone having all the original AJ sigs upon initial release except maybe Kadeem Hardison and His Airness himself. Only children beleive that average joes had every single Air Jordan release back in the mid '80s-'90s. Even these celebs that people consider "OG heads" didn't have every model. buying shoes was totaltay different from what it is now. The only people who think it's always been the way it is now, are the ones who weren't around or too young to remember.
How is it so ridiculous? $100 now is a whole lot different than $100 in the 90s.
That's ridiculous.
1, shoes werent that much back then. 2, If a kid got a pair or two of shoes a year why wouldnt that kid choose the newest pair of Jordans every time? Why would his parents have to be wealthy for that to happen? Especially considering that they went on sale most of the time back then anyway. 3, What if his dad simply liked Jordan and wanted to buy some Jordans for his kid to enjoy? Is that far fetched?
How is it so ridiculous? $100 now is a whole lot different than $100 in the 90s.
yooooooo good looks on these pics [emoji]128293[/emoji][emoji]128293[/emoji][emoji]128293[/emoji][emoji]128293[/emoji]my holiest of grails! no retro card with retail pairs
View media item 1609065View media item 1609068View media item 1609073View media item 1609077View media item 1609080View media item 1609085View media item 1609089View media item 1609091View media item 1609093View media item 1609095View media item 1609071