- May 15, 2003
- 61,326
- 76,058
It's an April Fools joke lol, literally says Feb 29th
He also confirmed it was this morning on Twitter
Damn

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's an April Fools joke lol, literally says Feb 29th
He also confirmed it was this morning on Twitter

Do you agree that this is uncalled for? Especially how bad da last retro was. Additionally, he has done this several times and gets old, (while posting fakes). He should be punished and ashamed for this. Most of us look at everything pros and cons. I don’t see any pros to doing this do you?Damn
![]()

I was confused too last retro was amazingNot really understanding the comment above about the last retro being trash. The 2015s were near perfect. Some people had a bit of a bump in the toe box, but mine were fine and comfortable. If this retro goes back to that horrible light grey midsole I'll be passing hard; looks awful. 2015 was damn near close to the OG.
Got rid of my 2015s thinking these would retro again soon and it had been 10 years, and I'd like to get a half size up. If they screw it up somehow I'll be super disappointed.
The other (minor imo) thing I remember a lot of NT complaining about was that the multi color scheme on the tongue wasn’t similar to OG (either in color tone, or the pattern of it, I forget)Not really understanding the comment above about the last retro being trash. The 2015s were near perfect. Some people had a bit of a bump in the toe box, but mine were fine and comfortable. If this retro goes back to that horrible light grey midsole I'll be passing hard; looks awful. 2015 was damn near close to the OG.
Got rid of my 2015s thinking these would retro again soon and it had been 10 years, and I'd like to get a half size up. If they screw it up somehow I'll be super disappointed.
It's honestly a commonly shared sentiment by people that don't give a **** about accuracy to the OG. I remember reading the same thing back in 2015.Not really understanding the comment above about the last retro being trash. The 2015s were near perfect. Some people had a bit of a bump in the toe box, but mine were fine and comfortable. If this retro goes back to that horrible light grey midsole I'll be passing hard; looks awful. 2015 was damn near close to the OG.
Got rid of my 2015s thinking these would retro again soon and it had been 10 years, and I'd like to get a half size up. If they screw it up somehow I'll be super disappointed.
The last retro in my opinion had unacceptable materials and aged very poorly. The only other VII retro I can think of that was made worse was the 2011 Cardinals. But yes I was happy with everything else except the toebox.
These weren’t too bad The other 2 were bad thoughHell nah![]()

I’m 31 and i definitely prefer the 2011 pair.I have a feeling when these finally retro they’re going to do that silver midsole to appease Gen Z. Hopefully the individuals that helped with the Jordan 3 or 13 are working on these.
I can’t remember what the theme was supposed to be. But the Bordeaux ended up being the best.Never knew those Bordeaux lows existed and released, wow
Should’ve came with a fine![]()
Hares were definitely not near perfect. It had the tight neoprene on the toe and a weird shape compared to the Bordeaux retro of the same year. Not egregious, but a subpar shape nonetheless. Agree with everything said about the Bords though, and on feet you couldn’t even see the bump. Materials were solid on that retro compared to 2011, had that Durabuck feel.2015 retro was near perfect aside from the toe box bump. People complaining about the materials don’t remember the OG. The 2015 was nearly identical in terms of materials.
As far as color patterns on the tongue I think it’s subjective, but I like pairs that had a lot of yellow in the pattern.
The 2015 Hares were near perfect too, and didn’t have the toe bump.