- Jul 7, 2005
- 18,389
- 8,775
Great message and lesson. It also applies to Cam and those like him.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Folks be playing with their lives man.
Nah, don't let nobody play with you. Run those suckas up out of there. They did right. The next fools will think twice before trying that mess.Just like Twitter, ignore these mfs and don't engage with them
They want a reaction. Don't give it to them. Make them feel really stupid.


Respectfully fam, how are they "playing with you" if you ignore them?Nah, don't let nobody play with you. Run those suckas up out of there. They did right. The next fools will think twice before trying that mess.
Because the lion can eat the sheep anytime it wants, and there’s nothing the sheep can do about it.A lion does not concern himself with the opinion of sheep
The “debate me bro” playbook is simple and effective: demand that serious people engage with your conspiracy theories or extremist talking points. If they decline, cry “censorship!” and claim they’re “afraid of the truth.” If they accept, turn the interaction into a performance designed to generate viral clips and false legitimacy. It’s a heads-I-win-tails-you-lose proposition that has nothing to do with genuine intellectual discourse.
The fundamental issue with “debate me bro” culture isn’t just that it’s obnoxious, it’s that it creates a false equivalence between good-faith expertise and bad-faith trolling. When you agree to debate someone pushing long-debunked conspiracy theories or openly hateful ideologies, you’re implicitly suggesting that their position deserves equal consideration alongside established facts and expert analysis.
Why are we always expected to take the moral high road?Respectfully fam, how are they "playing with you" if you ignore them?
You gotta lil bro them
A lion does not concern himself with the opinion of sheep
![]()
Turns out two-parent households are no fix for racial inequality — Harvard Gazette
New data-based study debunks long-held notion, finds wide opportunity gaps remainnews.harvard.edu
Let’s set one thing straight: This is not an argument against marriage and the nuclear family. Can you summarize the book’s argument?
This is a book about the power and limits of this important family structure. For decades, Americans have been led to believe in the power of the two-parent family for fixing racial inequality. The idea here is that some groups, like African Americans, have a harder time getting ahead because they have lower rates of two-parent families than groups that are, on average, better off. The idea is that African Americans could level the playing field by embodying the nuclear family ideal. My book shows this just isn’t the case.
They needed a report to say two Black != two White people?![]()
Turns out two-parent households are no fix for racial inequality — Harvard Gazette
New data-based study debunks long-held notion, finds wide opportunity gaps remainnews.harvard.edu
Rip
![]()
Assata Shakur, wanted Black Liberation Army member, dies at 78 in Cuba
Shakur, also known as Joanne Chesimard, fled to Cuba after her conviction of the murder of New Jersey State Trooper Werner Foerster.abcnews.go.com
library.saintheron.com

Not about taking the moral high road or being pushovers.Why are we always expected to take the moral high road?
Why do WE need to be the pushover?
They are coming onto OUR campus, attempting to disrupt, but we are supposed to turn the other cheek and look elsewhere?
Make it make sense man.
