When gays and transsexuals are demanding to use male/female bathrooms and get married, you aren’t on here with that “you don’t understand politics”, “dey won’t make da primaries”
When people caping for immigrants talk about defunding ICE, and shutting down the border patrol and extending DACA, you aren’t on here with that “you don’t understand politics”, “dey won’t make da primaries”
When Jewish people are demanding billions in aid to Israel, hate crime legislation, so forth and so on, you aren’t on here with that “you don’t understand politics”, “dey won’t make da primaries”
When black people want something specifically, then all of the excuses come out.
people may disagree, but to my mind, the political argument(s) for the above is pretty straightforward...
gays & transexuals, to my mind, are just asking for equal treatment under the law, which has significant overlap and forms coalitions with liberals, people who are for individual freedoms, and those who place human/civil rights as important. that they make (somewhat reaching) parallels to the civil rights movement is not accidental...
us aid to israel, is strategic to us interests in the region which finds common ground with conservatives, warhawks, the christian right, and islamophobes alike. on hate crimes, there is common advocacy with human/vivil rights groups, lgbtq, an immigrant communities.
concerns about immigration have overlapping interest(s) with the agricultural sector (better solutions for migrant workers), immigrant populations, corporations (hb1 visas & control over sponsored workforce), human/civil rights advocates, there is even an argument that because so many foreign students come here for their studies they should get a pass to stay if they want rather than be forced to leave to build somewhere else that the entrepreneurial advocates are on.
that black folk want something specifically is not really an issue, but it would seem in order to make such demands palatable/realizable/tenable they should find ways to appeal to other group's sensibilities; that is politics. so in a fundamental way, those offering the criticism that a 'black' agenda need not appeal to other groups are kinda lacking an understanding of how the machine works. intersectionality gets a bad perception because of the 'social justice warrior' connotation but being able to see where the overlap in where different folks agendas are in order to achieve a common goal is just logical/pragmatic.
that noted, it is fair to say that certain demographics have been particularly unreceptive/unwilling to find or look for parallels in the black agenda (even now with the so called 'opiod crisis,' hollowing out of the middle class, and the de-investment in certain local economies, all things that could apply to black communities to a large extent) but it just isn't the case that most politicians (generally speaking) are outright ignoring solutions for black communities; even the staunchest of conservatives find their way to a black church/black audience to 'sell' their wares on solutions on what ails black folks on their campaigns...the efficacy of these solutions is an important, but separate criticism. it is also an important but separate criticism that many politicians aren't always able to affectively or effectively articulate to different audiences how their solutions will address their all different constituents, especially given all the polarization of the electorate and all different niche groups and information sources...
also part of what should be in question is what exactly is the national black agenda? what are the applicable & scalable things black americans are asking for that are going ignored?? asking how we as black folk, if the realities of a operating in 2 party system are not viable as some are wont to claim, get there should not be viewed as a personal attack or even defense of the current system but as the pressing question it is!