- Feb 11, 2008
- 19,732
- 12,836
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They already do.Somewhere there's a black liberal woman screaming stop the patriarchy! , black men are the white men of the black community.......date that man
who can't wait to
Somewhere there's a black liberal woman screaming stop the patriarchy! , black men are the white men of the black community.......date that man
who can't wait to
The soil itself cannot accept the Pan-Africanism tree. The ideology was relevant to African affairs only because of the direct European rule that came with colonialism.How can the roots grow deep if they are uprooted not long after being planted? That is what Western meddling has done.
3900stabler You're seeing the trees, but not the forest.
Ivy league schools are the gatekeepers to social, scientific, economic, and political power in America. Forcing the student bodies of these schools to be less diverse is going to lead to an homogenization of the American ruling class (that's the long term goal). That's why AA was important: it made sure that the groups most likely to shape America's future would reflect the diversity that exists in America's lower classes.
I don't think I need to draw a picture to describe what happened in this country when the ruling class was made up of white men only.
The soil itself cannot accept the Pan-Africanism tree. The ideology was relevant to African affairs only because of the direct European rule that came with colonialism.
Pan-Africanism ignores the geopolitical context within the continent: it requires one to buy into the idea that before Europeans, Africa was in a permanent state of economic and political utopia, which couldn't be further from the truth (see all the empires that grew and died long before the arrival of the Portuguese). Africa has a very long history of internal conflicts that stem from issues that are relevant to the local populations, and Pan-Africanism's solution to this is essentially "you look alike, you should stop fighting!" Good luck applying that between Rwanda and the DRC.
Another flaw of the ideology is, it assumes that the identity layers within blackness are not more important than blackness itself. This assumption is not valid in Africa: region of origin/ethnicity and nationality are the most important group identifiers. Race (blackness) generally ranks way lower than these two, and it is only ever mentioned when discussing African-to- non African relations.
I think it's been effective at diversifying the ruling class.i see what you’re saying, and i don’t think we are past having affirmative action as a utility to address some imbalance in opportunities but is it really the case that it proved to be effective in addressing of the general diversity of our populace in leadership/the ‘ruling class?’
As I said before, Ivy league schools in the modern form are commoners essentially trying to create an aristocracy.
Their roots are from nobodies who fled Europe and when they got here they wanted to create their own nobility and ruling class.
I think it's been effective at diversifying the ruling class.
Do you think this country would've elected a black president who was a exceptional as Obama without coming out of an Ivy?
I don't know about exceptional. He was used as a puppet. The man was responsible for the removal of Gaddafi who wanted to not use petro dollars and use the gold backed dinarDo you think this country would've elected a black president who was a exceptional as Obama without coming out of an Ivy?
Branquiamento….Black entertainers lowkey be wanting to get rid of their blackness
Diana Ross, The Jacksons etc
Three generations right here