- 90
- 10
- Joined
- Mar 27, 2001
^ And there are some that "witness" it, and say it's a simple adaptation, and not evolution. See mutation theory.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Originally Posted by Bearcat23
^ And there are some that "witness" it, and say it's a simple adaptation, and not evolution. See mutation theory.
Originally Posted by Bearcat23
^ And there are some that "witness" it, and say it's a simple adaptation, and not evolution. See mutation theory.
Originally Posted by Bearcat23
^ Mutation as a vehicle of evolution. . . Read mutation theory. Mutation is largely harmful.
300 jump off a roof. 299 die. 1 survives.
This is largely your issue with this equation correct? We have numbers on our side, must be correct? But with mutation. . . if you're banking on numbers. . . the odds are with the 299. Mutation banks on the 1 (numbers obviously fitting my previous example and not completely within the realm of the exact probability).
I'm not saying that evolution is not true. I'm not saying creationism isn't true. I'm saying, both require a leap of faith.
Originally Posted by Bearcat23
^ Mutation as a vehicle of evolution. . . Read mutation theory. Mutation is largely harmful.
300 jump off a roof. 299 die. 1 survives.
This is largely your issue with this equation correct? We have numbers on our side, must be correct? But with mutation. . . if you're banking on numbers. . . the odds are with the 299. Mutation banks on the 1 (numbers obviously fitting my previous example and not completely within the realm of the exact probability).
I'm not saying that evolution is not true. I'm not saying creationism isn't true. I'm saying, both require a leap of faith.
But it's DAME THEORYOriginally Posted by Bearcat23
"Stupid"
Hawking - Oxford
Behe - Penn
O'reilly - Harvard
Dame Theory - ?
The point is, none of these people are "stupid." Differing opinions on the origin of the universe, earth, species... do not make a person stupid, but rather, differing in their opinions.
Rolaholic wrote:
Typical NT athiest thread
And I don't support Bill O'Reilly at all for the things he says but let people believe what they want to believe. No one's stupid because of what they believe in.
Tell em again Rolaholic
But it's DAME THEORYOriginally Posted by Bearcat23
"Stupid"
Hawking - Oxford
Behe - Penn
O'reilly - Harvard
Dame Theory - ?
The point is, none of these people are "stupid." Differing opinions on the origin of the universe, earth, species... do not make a person stupid, but rather, differing in their opinions.
Rolaholic wrote:
Typical NT athiest thread
And I don't support Bill O'Reilly at all for the things he says but let people believe what they want to believe. No one's stupid because of what they believe in.
Tell em again Rolaholic