- Sep 15, 2012
- 955
- 329
What about what I said isn't true? There are poor people, who, if not for cell phones would not be accessing the internet on a regular basis.
And not catering to people is where Apple has erred for a long while now. Their rationale is that people only use their phone as a stop-gap until they can use their tablet or computer at home.
But, a lot of people don't have money for other devices and do all their web-browsing, facebooking, etc. almost exclusively on their phone and want a bigger screen on what is essentially their only computing device.
And yes, while Iphones are pricier than some tablets, computers, other phones, the wonderful thing about phones is they are subsidized via rate plans. And if there is one thing people love more than anything, it's deferring costs until the future. So most people pony up there initial $99 or $199 and don't even care or realize that they are paying $699 for a phone.
And not catering to people is where Apple has erred for a long while now. Their rationale is that people only use their phone as a stop-gap until they can use their tablet or computer at home.
But, a lot of people don't have money for other devices and do all their web-browsing, facebooking, etc. almost exclusively on their phone and want a bigger screen on what is essentially their only computing device.
And yes, while Iphones are pricier than some tablets, computers, other phones, the wonderful thing about phones is they are subsidized via rate plans. And if there is one thing people love more than anything, it's deferring costs until the future. So most people pony up there initial $99 or $199 and don't even care or realize that they are paying $699 for a phone.
Last edited: