- 9,064
- 1,157
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2009
Originally Posted by ex carrabba fan
Originally Posted by Freeze
mamba should have been 2nd and Wade 1st
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Originally Posted by ex carrabba fan
Originally Posted by Freeze
mamba should have been 2nd and Wade 1st
Originally Posted by ex carrabba fan
Originally Posted by Freeze
mamba should have been 2nd and Wade 1st
Originally Posted by Clutchshooter
No kevin love. .
The league leaders in the 3 major categories of scoring, rebounds, and assists should always be on an All NBA Team regardless of team record.
Originally Posted by Clutchshooter
No kevin love. .
The league leaders in the 3 major categories of scoring, rebounds, and assists should always be on an All NBA Team regardless of team record.
Originally Posted by Xtapolapacetl
Man, remember all those years when Pippen the sidekick was all-NBA 1st team and Jordan was all-NBA 2nd team? The 90s are full of such examples.
Originally Posted by Xtapolapacetl
Man, remember all those years when Pippen the sidekick was all-NBA 1st team and Jordan was all-NBA 2nd team? The 90s are full of such examples.
Originally Posted by University of Nike
So, from a completely statistical standpoint - no bias, no "watching the game," no "clutch," no "intangibles," no stanisms (I might trademark that), no homerism - there is really no reason why Kobe should be in the first team above Wade. He shot free throws better, and hit 1% more of his threes... Wade beat him in in pretty much every other "box score" statistic and efficiency ranking.
You can now commence explosions, name calling, and other craziness.
Originally Posted by University of Nike
So, from a completely statistical standpoint - no bias, no "watching the game," no "clutch," no "intangibles," no stanisms (I might trademark that), no homerism - there is really no reason why Kobe should be in the first team above Wade. He shot free throws better, and hit 1% more of his threes... Wade beat him in in pretty much every other "box score" statistic and efficiency ranking.
You can now commence explosions, name calling, and other craziness.
Originally Posted by University of Nike
So, from a completely statistical standpoint - no bias, no "watching the game," no "clutch," no "intangibles," no stanisms (I might trademark that), no homerism - there is really no reason why Kobe should be in the first team above Wade. He shot free throws better, and hit 1% more of his threes... Wade beat him in in pretty much every other "box score" statistic and efficiency ranking.
You can now commence explosions, name calling, and other craziness.
Originally Posted by University of Nike
So, from a completely statistical standpoint - no bias, no "watching the game," no "clutch," no "intangibles," no stanisms (I might trademark that), no homerism - there is really no reason why Kobe should be in the first team above Wade. He shot free throws better, and hit 1% more of his threes... Wade beat him in in pretty much every other "box score" statistic and efficiency ranking.
You can now commence explosions, name calling, and other craziness.
Originally Posted by University of Nike
So, from a completely statistical standpoint - no bias, no "watching the game," no "clutch," no "intangibles," no stanisms (I might trademark that), no homerism - there is really no reason why Kobe should be in the first team above Wade. He shot free throws better, and hit 1% more of his threes... Wade beat him in in pretty much every other "box score" statistic and efficiency ranking.
You can now commence explosions, name calling, and other craziness.
Originally Posted by University of Nike
So, from a completely statistical standpoint - no bias, no "watching the game," no "clutch," no "intangibles," no stanisms (I might trademark that), no homerism - there is really no reason why Kobe should be in the first team above Wade. He shot free throws better, and hit 1% more of his threes... Wade beat him in in pretty much every other "box score" statistic and efficiency ranking.
You can now commence explosions, name calling, and other craziness.
Originally Posted by abovelegit1
And the argument for Kobe over Wade is probably similar to the argument for MVP. So if we weighed these "intangible" qualities so heavily for MVP, whatever they are, then why not for all-NBA? Not saying I agree with that line of reasoning, but some consistency would be nice.
Originally Posted by abovelegit1
And the argument for Kobe over Wade is probably similar to the argument for MVP. So if we weighed these "intangible" qualities so heavily for MVP, whatever they are, then why not for all-NBA? Not saying I agree with that line of reasoning, but some consistency would be nice.
Originally Posted by abovelegit1
Solid teams, Chris Paul wasn't given enough credit, as usual, and Dirk should have been on the first team over Durant.
And the argument for Kobe over Wade is probably similar to the argument for MVP. So if we weighed these "intangible" qualities so heavily for MVP, whatever they are, then why not for all-NBA? Not saying I agree with that line of reasoning, but some consistency would be nice.
Originally Posted by dland24
CP3 probably should have been 2nd team, but I dont really have any issues with these teams.
Originally Posted by abovelegit1
Solid teams, Chris Paul wasn't given enough credit, as usual, and Dirk should have been on the first team over Durant.
And the argument for Kobe over Wade is probably similar to the argument for MVP. So if we weighed these "intangible" qualities so heavily for MVP, whatever they are, then why not for all-NBA? Not saying I agree with that line of reasoning, but some consistency would be nice.
Originally Posted by dland24
CP3 probably should have been 2nd team, but I dont really have any issues with these teams.