- Nov 5, 2003
- 3,646
- 2,510
These look like high top bowling shoes
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
These are awful, the Frags look like some reject T-Mac design from 2002 with Jumpman branding. Nike/JB needs to put people who designed the FOG 1s on the next mainline model or hire the designer(s) who designed the Yeezy QNTMs.
Helllllllllll nah
the air JORDAN line is in great hands with Tate. He’s dropped a couple classics ( 31, 34 ) since he took over, and the others were not bad. His 5 year run is better than tinkers last 5.
the air JORDAN line is in great hands with Tate. He’s dropped a couple classics ( 31, 34 ) since he took over, and the others were not bad. His 5 year run is better than tinkers last 5.
You consider the 31 and 34 classics?? Lmao, good lord, just when I thought I’ve heard it all on this forum.. I’m done-that’s enough NT for the day..
[/QUOTE
BRUH. You said the designer of THIS should take over the greatest sneaker line in history. You actually wrote it. I’d say it is time to be done for the day.
The 34 was hardly universally praised. On aggregate the views might have been positive, but not everyone was feeling themThe 34 were first universally praised Jordan shoe in quite some time. Might go down as a classic shoe in years to come.
Every new pic of the 35 frags..... I need those badly
Ehh, some people will like them some will hate them, it’s the same every year with every new model. I kinda like them because they do remind me of the V’s which are my favorites but that netting on the toe really kills them IMO.
As long as they dont pop prematurely.Damn the tech alone on these seems like it will be worth the buy. Look at that massive heel zoom and forefoot.
That's true that would really suck especially them being exposed.As long as they dont pop prematurely.
Honestly the Frags are my least favorite colorway we’ve seen so far..