- Feb 7, 2016
- 13,286
- 10,780
Was thinking the exact same thing ... why is there elephant print on a shoe supposedly loosely inspired by the IV? Dopey. It's like they've decided that these historic colorways are just JORDAN colorways in general and not tied to any specific models anymore. Stupid.
I'm only "shocked" because of what I said, how the mid 34s seem to have done really well and a couple colorways in particular getting loads of love on here. Other than the Chicago mids, these are the most Bulls colorway of the lot. I'm guessing a lot of it has to do with these being lows and lows generally not getting the same respect in general across various Jordan models. Gotta believe that if they did a mid 34 in this exact colorway and with this toe, they would've flown as quick or quicker than any of the other mids did. But you're right, I ain't complaining.
not sure. I guess it appeals to some particular shoes. some shoes do well as high, some mids and some low. if I were younger, the lows would have been ok for me. reason being is that nowadays, lows seem to fall out of my foot, hurt my heel and less secure for my ankles. I could play in them although I would practically end up injured most of the time. although it seems my flying days are over and pretty much slower than usual, so I guess wearing lows as a designated spot up shooter would be ok again I guess.