- 489
- 39
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2008
Pass. 160!!! Really?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
you do realise these retailed for $150 back in 99 , a $10 price hike is mild compared to what they did with the concord 11'sOriginally Posted by SirCharles
Pass. 160!!! Really?
Didn't have the '05's, but how was the sockliner closer to them than these new ones? I'm looking at my White/Red XIV OGs and the sockliner looks the exact same as these retros, just in white (which is not close to the CDP XIVs I have).
And with the IIIs and IVs originally $100 if im not mistaken, might be less in 1988-89. up to $150, now $160. 60% increase in priceOriginally Posted by JIM SHADY2003
you do realise these retailed for $150 back in 99 , a $10 price hike is mild compared to what they did with the concord 11'sOriginally Posted by SirCharles
Pass. 160!!! Really?
Originally Posted by BBallAddict1
True.
But I care more about the material used on the toes and side panels, than on the sockliner.
The 2011s seem closer to the OGs in that regard.
Same can be said with the retro 13's people still bought it with the 10 dollar increaseOriginally Posted by JIM SHADY2003
you do realise these retailed for $150 back in 99 , a $10 price hike is mild compared to what they did with the concord 11'sOriginally Posted by SirCharles
Pass. 160!!! Really?
Originally Posted by PoloPlaya
they just were imo. The tongue was longer, no metal tips on the laces, and that suede was horrible.Originally Posted by adub beta
can you explain why the 05 retro is trash?Originally Posted by PoloPlaya
the og last shot xiv's from 99 was one of the best shoes I ever played bball in. I still have a DS pair from 99. I'd rather spend another $60.00 or $70.00 and buy another pair of og last shots before I bought these. Both these & the 05 retro are trash imo.