- 15,762
- 517
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2005
Originally Posted by Animal Thug1539
It's been confirmed Swoosh.com will get these. I'm happy. Let's get it.
Doesn't swoosh get all general releases, or do they vary?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Originally Posted by Animal Thug1539
It's been confirmed Swoosh.com will get these. I'm happy. Let's get it.
varies.Originally Posted by FrenchBlue23
Originally Posted by Animal Thug1539
It's been confirmed Swoosh.com will get these. I'm happy. Let's get it.
Doesn't swoosh get all general releases, or do they vary?
i feel u but the angle u took da pix n ur lighting is different from da angle others took nd there lighting. now i understand if u had a pair rite now but hey lets jus keep our fingers crossed til release dayOriginally Posted by shoeking2345
i have 2 retract a statement I made earlier in this post stating that there IS 3m material on the 2010 versions. After looking at every pic in this thread including the pics claimed to be taking in the dark with the flash, I have come to the conclusion that there is no 3m material. I took pics of anything I could think of that has 3m material (retro 5, bred retro 13's form 04, new balance 993, the back of the am 95, and the back of a north face book bag) and all had the same affect with the flash on when I took the pic. As far as a "dull" 3m, I don't know if it exists. I've taken multiple pics of different things and all look the same with the flash on. I think it is a different material, and the reason it looks like 3m imo, is because the specks of whatever it is are bigger then the 3m material and are therefore more noticeable. Not to beat a dead hourse or bring up an old argument but these are my fav J's and its disappointing...sorry for the long a@@ post
Chuuch. I have a feeling these aren't going to be discounted on Swoosh on release.Originally Posted by bigj505
varies.Originally Posted by FrenchBlue23
Originally Posted by Animal Thug1539
It's been confirmed Swoosh.com will get these. I'm happy. Let's get it.
Doesn't swoosh get all general releases, or do they vary?
also, some releases are not discounted on swoosh on release date but are later on down the road. sometimes its a couple of days later. sometimes its weeks.
space jams, db 6 (early releases not release date) were on swoosh
lakers 6s, white/red 6s werent on swoosh on the 1st day.
foamposite pro pearls were not discounted day 1 but were like 4 days later.
Originally Posted by JAYS
how do you get a swoosh.com acct can someone guide me out???
Originally Posted by RL Treyce
hahah 3??
There is no limit on the number of sub accounts a employee can create, Some employees have ten plus...
very true, only thing is i took all pics in the dark as did someone else on this forum which is y i came to that conclusion. and believe me my fingers are crossed, 13's are my fav J's. Ahh well guess we'll c come november.Originally Posted by thebeast23
i feel u but the angle u took da pix n ur lighting is different from da angle others took nd there lighting. now i understand if u had a pair rite now but hey lets jus keep our fingers crossed til release dayOriginally Posted by shoeking2345
i have 2 retract a statement I made earlier in this post stating that there IS 3m material on the 2010 versions. After looking at every pic in this thread including the pics claimed to be taking in the dark with the flash, I have come to the conclusion that there is no 3m material. I took pics of anything I could think of that has 3m material (retro 5, bred retro 13's form 04, new balance 993, the back of the am 95, and the back of a north face book bag) and all had the same affect with the flash on when I took the pic. As far as a "dull" 3m, I don't know if it exists. I've taken multiple pics of different things and all look the same with the flash on. I think it is a different material, and the reason it looks like 3m imo, is because the specks of whatever it is are bigger then the 3m material and are therefore more noticeable. Not to beat a dead hourse or bring up an old argument but these are my fav J's and its disappointing...sorry for the long a@@ post
Originally Posted by blacklion23
Kixclusive has the Flints up for preorder. In the description summary it states that there is no 3M material. The pic posted is the 05 Flints. Guess I'll stick to my OGs and 05s. No 3M=No cop for me.
Originally Posted by raidercb5
After all the post saying theres no 3M, I think Im going to have to stop wearing my 05's and for sure get two pairs of 2010's....one to rock and one to keep icy. 05 are going to back into reserve, not risking it
Originally Posted by raidercb5
After all the post saying theres no 3M, I think Im going to have to stop wearing my 05's and for sure get two pairs of 2010's....one to rock and one to keep icy. 05 are going to back into reserve, not risking it
Originally Posted by justhotkicks
The 2010 Retro quality on the Flints is very, very good. Surprising, actually. The shoes run small, though. I might have to 11 on these (i'm 10/10.5). Strange for a XIII to run small.
Originally Posted by raidercb5
At French Blue 23 and dtb00201...the reason why Im buying two pairs of 2010's is cause Im going to ball in one pair rock one pair and keep my 05's on ice. Quality might be coo on the new ones, but 05 are closer to OG's because of the 3M. Might no mean much to you guys, but I prefer the shine than little to no shine. Just my opinion