utahman130
Supporter
- May 27, 2019
- 1,797
- 6,023
Forgot to post pics of my pair when I got it in.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Same for me last Thursday. Thats why I'm not messing with FTL or they're partner stores till things are back to normal. Kept my loot for over 2 weeks.May 4th order from FTL that got cancelled, finally got credited back this morning lol.
So you guys really telling me these fit different from the 2013s? I may grab a 12 but I usually wear a 11-11.5
Not sure of all the half size down talk. These fit like any other 5 I have owned IMO. Got one in my usual 11 and one in 10.5 just based off of what people were saying in here. 10.5 felt restricted where 11 was perfect as always.
Thanks! I may cop the 12, but there's an 11 for 20 bucks more....No worries. Let dudes walk around in shoes that are too tight if they wish. These are definitely TTS.
Thanks! I may cop the 12, but there's an 11 for 20 bucks more....
Everybody has a different foot. I'm a TTS 9.5 and 9.5 on every other AJ. I bought a 9 and 9.5, and I preferred the fit of the 9.
Wow, look at the difference in that toebox construction.
Yeah the correct is somewhere between the two we've gotten.The BM toe box is actually more of the correct rand shape. It's not supposed to be so short like these FRs; it's supposed to be slanted. BMs didn't have the fully correct slant, but with these FRs they just made the cut shorter instead of trying to get the slant right. Toe box shape doesn't look good to me at all. Interesting how some think that looks right. These aren't 3s where that rand is supposed to be so much thinner than we've been getting, despite having a slant or not.
Google images of vintage 5s and you'll see. Don't mistaken the height of that cut with the slant.
The BM toe box is actually more of the correct rand shape. It's not supposed to be so short like these FRs; it's supposed to be slanted. BMs didn't have the fully correct slant, but with these FRs they just made the cut shorter instead of trying to get the slant right. Toe box shape doesn't look good to me at all. Interesting how some think that looks right. These aren't 3s where that rand is supposed to be so much thinner than we've been getting, despite having a slant or not.
Google images of vintage 5s and you'll see. Don't mistaken the height of that cut with the slant.
I absolutely love the Fire Red toe comparatively.
The BM toe box is actually more of the correct rand shape. It's not supposed to be so short like these FRs; it's supposed to be slanted. BMs didn't have the fully correct slant, but with these FRs they just made the cut shorter instead of trying to get the slant right. Toe box shape doesn't look good to me at all. Interesting how some think that looks right. These aren't 3s where that rand is supposed to be so much thinner than we've been getting, despite having a slant or not.
Google images of vintage 5s and you'll see. Don't mistaken the height of that cut with the slant.
I'm just deciding between the 2 pairs I have. 11.5 and 11. If I don't want the 11 I'll let you know. I'd want retail in Canada - which is what I paid, plus shipping to you.I'm becoming a ghost hunter trying to find an 11 here in ATL. Every store I go to just sold a return before I got there.... Just need a legit size 11.... thats all.