- 2,027
- 10
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2008
How does these look in GS sizes?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Originally Posted by NobleKane
quit getting mad like a young chick son. man up and face the truth. *@$!* is so mad he callin dudes clownsOriginally Posted by GottaBdaShoes
So you're saying they looked authentic before you noticed the jumpman? lmao some of you dudes are straight clowns with all these small 'concerns'.Originally Posted by NobleKane
i didnt even notice the backwards jumpman until today lol it makes the shoe look fake.
in pics of the right shoe online? yes. instore where you actually see um in person and with the backwards jumpman? no. sorry but thats the truth. and not only the jumpman but the black nubuck is thinner and doesnt give the midsole that fat effect like the 2002's
sorry for !*%$#*!* on your purchase. quit being so emotional
Originally Posted by BIG MIKE
For anyone that wants them now but doesn't want to pay retail, I ordered off eastbay and used the 20% off code and got them for $127 shipped.
*looks at ebay link* riiiiiiiiightOriginally Posted by GottaBdaShoes
Originally Posted by NobleKane
quit getting mad like a young chick son. man up and face the truth. *@$!* is so mad he callin dudes clownsOriginally Posted by GottaBdaShoes
So you're saying they looked authentic before you noticed the jumpman? lmao some of you dudes are straight clowns with all these small 'concerns'.Originally Posted by NobleKane
i didnt even notice the backwards jumpman until today lol it makes the shoe look fake.
in pics of the right shoe online? yes. instore where you actually see um in person and with the backwards jumpman? no. sorry but thats the truth. and not only the jumpman but the black nubuck is thinner and doesnt give the midsole that fat effect like the 2002's
sorry for !*%$#*!* on your purchase. quit being so emotional
Yes, because what others do and say indirectly makes me mad. haha.
You should research before you type. It just makes you look dumber later on. Like now. I get them early and I never pay retail or anything close to it for my kicks.
Also, according to you I'm getting emotional yet you're coming at me with so much animosity. Kind of feels like you want to bite my ankle or something. When I leave this forum, I don't even think about NT. That's the difference between us. No need for your rebuttal. Get over it. ha.
Looks like I'll be able to get a pair for the lowOriginally Posted by Remi23
Originally Posted by ehbball88
Saw these at a Footaction today at around 3:00 and they told me they hadn't sold one pair yet
Originally Posted by 617collector
Pass rather have the 02's or the cdp's
2002's>2010Originally Posted by ninjahood
Originally Posted by 617collector
Pass rather have the 02's or the cdp's
da 2002's suck, cracks for days....i want to buy another pair to replace but scared that all IX's will chip.
da 2002's suck, cracks for days....i want to buy another pair to replace but scared that all IX's will chip.
My powders have been great so far. My 02 IX chipped horribly, but the 10 powders have not at all after 2 weeks straight of wear.
da 2002's suck, cracks for days....i want to buy another pair to replace but scared that all IX's will chip.
My powders have been great so far. My 02 IX chipped horribly, but the 10 powders have not at all after 2 weeks straight of wear.
Originally Posted by Mikkol109
This has been one of the most quietest release ..
so that just means i REALLY ain't getting emOriginally Posted by Remi23
2002's>2010Originally Posted by ninjahood
Originally Posted by 617collector
Pass rather have the 02's or the cdp's
da 2002's suck, cracks for days....i want to buy another pair to replace but scared that all IX's will chip.