rainking
Supporter
- Aug 12, 2016
- 8,308
- 18,139
Your endless streak of bad takes continues … endlessly.
Air Jordan IV “Black/Cement” - May 4th 2019
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by Bert.,
- Start date
- Jul 18, 2012
- 34,211
- 40,121
Your endless streak of bad takes continues … endlessly.
No im just not a cry baby.
Please show me the miniscule difference that show how meaningless and tiny it is in the grand scheme of things. Ill wait.
- Jul 1, 2008
- 14,932
- 20,321
They're fine for me until they release a version with the SB shape or better
2012s are completely unacceptable
2012s are completely unacceptable
rainking
Supporter
- Aug 12, 2016
- 8,308
- 18,139
No im just not a cry baby.
Please show me the miniscule difference that show how meaningless and tiny it is in the grand scheme of things. Ill wait.
I'm not getting sucked into the vortex of having the same discussion with you over and over again
It's fine with me if you (and anyone else) think the 2019s are just dandy. But saying the differences between them and the OGs or '99s or even the new SB IVs is "miniscule" isn't even close to accurate. I don't need to list the differences yet again or post comparison pics. If you can't see it or just don't care, that's cool. But calling people who can see it and don't like it "cry babies" is nonsense LOL
- Mar 29, 2001
- 22,314
- 70,723
Don’t take the bait bro, my man is top 3 fisherman lol
- Jul 18, 2012
- 34,211
- 40,121
I'm not getting sucked into the vortex of having the same discussion with you over and over again
It's fine with me if you (and anyone else) think the 2019s are just dandy. But saying the differences between them and the OGs or '99s or even the new SB IVs is "miniscule" isn't even close to accurate. I don't need to list the differences yet again or post comparison pics. If you can't see it or just don't care, that's cool. But calling people who can see it and don't like it "cry babies" is nonsense LOL
So you cant k.
- Feb 23, 2006
- 6,063
- 3,746
As long as the quality is good and the shape variance is small, no need to be a major discussion on it.
Ya'll throwing mushy cuffed chinos on anyway so shape ain't a concern for ya'll in real life.
Ya'll throwing mushy cuffed chinos on anyway so shape ain't a concern for ya'll in real life.
- Oct 6, 2016
- 10,637
- 23,606
If you like an unpopular old release, your wrong.
If you like the true OG look, your wrong. Damn I love this site.
Even if they say they "dont care" what the next thinks, they still give that last dig. Making sure you know what they think, of what you think.
If you like the true OG look, your wrong. Damn I love this site.
Even if they say they "dont care" what the next thinks, they still give that last dig. Making sure you know what they think, of what you think.
CARTEL777
Supporter
- Apr 15, 2019
- 2,762
- 37,267
- Jan 9, 2007
- 10,245
- 24,778
- Jan 15, 2014
- 1,827
- 3,129
I’m wondering what the price will be on these once they release the reimagined pair and that pair just ain’t gonna cut it.
- Nov 7, 2014
- 2,715
- 9,059
****, the 2019's are already going for $750+ in my size DS. I'd never pay that much for another of these. I'll just wait until 2029 or whenever.
- Apr 9, 2017
- 17,026
- 47,234
Watch: Drake Gets Air Jordans Thrown at Him During Concert
During his 'It's All a Blur' show.
- Sep 5, 2021
- 6,367
- 11,767
Never been a fan of Drake.
…never understood the hype.
…never understood the hype.
- Aug 13, 2000
- 1,658
- 3,942
**** is comical.
- Dec 29, 2003
- 9,928
- 34,561
- Aug 10, 2012
- 20,424
- 36,771
I wore them yesterday.
This is one of my favorite two jerseys to wear with these.
On-feet photo.
It's only proper for any rehashed Jordans from III to VI to have the "NIKE AIR" on the back. I never understood why Nike/Jordan Brand had to make unnecessary/unwanted revisions with the previous retros.
This is one of my favorite two jerseys to wear with these.
On-feet photo.
It's only proper for any rehashed Jordans from III to VI to have the "NIKE AIR" on the back. I never understood why Nike/Jordan Brand had to make unnecessary/unwanted revisions with the previous retros.
- Feb 12, 2014
- 5,305
- 6,941
Honestly think they put on the jumpman b/c Tinker wanted to remove all Nike and swooshes starting with the 3, but couldn't. Legend has it that he got agreement to take off the swoosh from the 3, but had to keep NA on the back. Once JB became more independent, they could remove NA and thus put on the jumpman. Then it was a struggle to get it back on b/c of losers like gentry, however, "the people" wanted it, and that eventually got done, and here we are.
- Apr 30, 2002
- 7,642
- 9,718
Tinker just wanted to finish the shoe, he was given the project six months behind.
Peter Moore created the Jumpman logo from a photo shoot, both men were genius.
Peter Moore created the Jumpman logo from a photo shoot, both men were genius.
- Dec 29, 2003
- 9,928
- 34,561
Maaaaaaaan.....this is Niketalk. The stupid Jumpman thing was all Gentry's fault.
He wanted to "protect the OG collectors"....remember?
- Feb 12, 2014
- 5,305
- 6,941
Maaaaaaaan.....this is Niketalk. The stupid Jumpman thing was all Gentry's fault.
Yes, I agree that's why he didn't bring NA back, however, I don't think he was around in the days when Tinker was working on the OGs and was trying to minimize Nike branding, and when the first retros came out. That's why the OG 3 design (if you believe the story) had the swoosh on it, which is what we saw with the Tinkers release. i.e. What I said, and what you said are not mutually exclusive.
- Dec 29, 2003
- 9,928
- 34,561
- Mar 27, 2007
- 4,329
- 7,460
Gentry making slop retros is the opposite of what collectors want.
They want exact copies of their favorite shoes, so they can have multiples and wear them when they want.
His logic was trash just like him, he wasted almost 20 years ruining the brand. I don't want to hear about how many sales they made because they would have made the same amount of sales with more accurate retros.
They want exact copies of their favorite shoes, so they can have multiples and wear them when they want.
His logic was trash just like him, he wasted almost 20 years ruining the brand. I don't want to hear about how many sales they made because they would have made the same amount of sales with more accurate retros.
- Feb 9, 2008
- 21,001
- 14,222
Size 10 DS with receipt $420 shipped
- Apr 16, 2019
- 2,029
- 4,222
Nice pickup. Kinda wish they would've pulled the trigger on these a few months later. From the cool grey to the black cat and so on the shape kept improving
Size 10 DS with receipt $420 shipped
Similar threads
