- 14,054
- 14,245
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2007
false. I've had every iteration of this shoe...Yeah that’s because the uppers on the 2012 was a disgusting thick hairy nubuck material. Of course is was thick. It was also trash. Durabuck is a thin material. In this case you would’ve thought OGs and ‘99s were “thin and flimsy” too I guess.
'89, '99, '08, '12 and now these. this pair is the flimsiest by far. it seems to be more on par with the '08. '12 was better quality although this pair LOOKS better. also, you didnt have to mix and match to put together a good pair do to inconsistent quality on the '12 release. the only things that were not better on the '12 is the jumpmam and midsole chipping.