- Aug 8, 2014
- 124
- 356
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Maybe they did it so u can differentiate the each year release idkOff center NA OR centered jumpman? It’s just that simple.
99s are superior. The 99 netting window doesn’t adhere to the mesh, it was movable/stretchable like the original. The plastic they use now is hard, fixed into place and will yellow in few years, look at the 2016s. Let’s not get ahead of ourselves and say dumb things like 19>99.Like you
The 99s retailed for $99.
Back in 99, I tried in these shoes in a shoe store called Soundfeet Shoes in Elizabeth City, NC. They were on sale at the time for $99. I tried them on, and decided not to get them. I wanted another shoe at the time.
Now I wish I would have gotten them. Back then, the retro game was as difficult.
Not sure how any justification can be made. I too will be grabbing a pair for pure nostalgia, but ignoring issues like this just give JB the right to continue this trend of butchering their own shoes.
Very pleased with these in hand!
some of you guys need to take an economics class and understand inflation, nothing in 1999 cost the same as today.
I took enough econ classes to convince a couple universities to give me degrees in the subject.some of you guys need to take an economics class and understand inflation nothing in 1999 cost the same as today.
I took econough econ classes to convince a couple universities to give me degrees in the subject.
First, $99 (probably $99.99) is somewhere around $151 in today's money. So these are much more expensive than the 99s from the jump.
Also, we are not getting comparable products in 2019 than we did in 1999. In an economics class they also talking about things like economies of scale, and labor cost.
JB is producing an inferior product at a higher scale with cheaper labor than what they did in 1999. So all things considered the margins on a pair of retro 4s is much better today than in 1999 for JB.
99s are superior. The 99 netting window doesn’t adhere to the mesh, it was movable/stretchable like the original. The plastic they use now is hard, fixed into place and will yellow in few years, look at the 2016s. Let’s not get ahead of ourselves and say dumb things like 19>99.
95% of y’allz on feet pics are the reason I’m not copping
Dude please. If rising labor cost increased so much that it cost and extra $50 per pair they would move the factories out of China to somewhere else in southeast Asia.ah so you forgot the rising cost of labor....
Dude please. If rising labor cost expanded that much for them for it to warrant and extra $50 per pair they would move the factories out of China to somewhere else in southeast Asia.
You'll need to stop reaching to defend JB's actions like they have no other choice. They want to profit maximize, cool, they have investors to answer too. But me as a consumer don't have to cape for them.
95% of y’allz on feet pics are the reason I’m not copping
Believe in 99 they were making these in Korea. Correct me if i am wrong.na you reaching sooooooo the cost of labor in china in 99 is the same as 2019 lmfaoooooo stawp bruh you reaching not me its common sense really.
Relax I was simply stating a fact. Dude said something about seeing them on sale for $99 but that was the actual retail price. Glad to hear you learned something in econ tho.some of you guys need to take an economics class and understand inflation, nothing in 1999 cost the same as today.
Believe in 99 they were making these in Korea. Correct me if i am wrong.
Relax I was simply stating a fact. Dude said something about seeing them on sale for $99 but that was the actual retail price. Glad to hear you learned something in econ tho.
Yes, it is probably higher per worker. Workers are also probably more productive because factories are more automated. So that offset some of the rising labor cost.na you reaching sooooooo the cost of labor in china in 99 is the same as 2018 lmfaoooooo stawp bruh you reaching not me its common sense really.
Yes, it is probably higher per worker. Workers are also probably more productive because factories are more automated. So that offset some of the rising labor cost.
And you are ignoring the economics of scale aspect that also lowers the cost of producing each.
The cost of capital is also probably lower since the Chinese government has been investing infrastructure, and subsidies to lower energy cost for the industrial sector.
Again, JB would not tolerate $50 per pair being eaten up just by labor cost.
Put your cape away.