- 7,837
- 4,851
Another classic that's gone to hell with the detailsShape is all wrong
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Another classic that's gone to hell with the detailsShape is all wrong
Another classic that's gone to hell with the details
while the 9s may be my least favorite model (yes the 2s are indeed fire to me) i do love the simple cws on them. I'd love to see UNC blues or charcoals come backI almost forgot how nice the 9s used to be. Beyond butchered at this point.
Neither one of those shoes would ever qualify as the "good ol days".For anyone down in the dumps because of Election Day or the unacceptable Fire Red IVs. Just remember the good ole days such as November 3rd 2014. The Photo Blue and Motorboat Jones were released. Funny I don’t remember these dropping on the same day. The photo blue was worn by R & B group Jagged Edge. The Motorboat Jones is still going for $600+ on stockx/goat/eBay. So Happy Six Year Anniversary (where the Bacardi at?)
It was also on this day the seductive Satin Bred Vs released in 2018.
These cws weren’t the worst things but the materials on those photo blues were straight dookie thoFor anyone down in the dumps because of Election Day or the unacceptable Fire Red IVs. Just remember the good ole days such as November 3rd 2014. The Photo Blue and Motorboat Jones were released. Funny I don’t remember these dropping on the same day. The photo blue was worn by R & B group Jagged Edge. The Motorboat Jones is still going for $600+ on stockx/goat/eBay. So Happy Six Year Anniversary (where the Bacardi at?)
It was also on this day the seductive Satin Bred Vs released in 2018.
So they gotta be a little clunkier-looking?Another classic that's gone to hell with the details
Are you insinuating you enjoy the bottom pair better than the original pair?So they gotta be a little clunkier-looking?
I see where did is coming from tho. That top pair honestly doesn’t look good even if they are an OG pair while the bottom pair while not fully accurate to the OGs do look slimmed down and cleaner.Are you insinuating you enjoy the bottom pair better than the original pair?
If so...that's cool.
But what was being referred to was how JB has butchered the "replica" of the original.
I peeped them too lol they look so good manMan I definitely never really liked the 9 but this pair is so damn nice too me. The early looks just posted by zsneakerheadz looks super clean
JB should look at THIS post right here. Originals passed on because of their dumb *** changes. The small reverse JM on a 9 has to be one the dumbest things they ever decided to do to a retro sig. Right behind removing NA branding. Seriously though, I am one that sometimes think people nit pick on the smallest of details but this, is in your face wrong. Whoever decided in 2010 to change it up needs their *** kicked. And of ALL releases they chose the Charcoal to do it on. Bull ****.The only pair of IX's I own are the CG's which are the best. Couple OG's are nice but never seemed worth it. Especially with the changes.
I had the OGs way back when and I wish I could remember how they felt. I don’t remember them being UNcomfortable though. Then I had the 2002 retro and don’t remember them being uncomfortable either but don’t remember them being super comfortable either. Haven’t owned a 9 since but always wanted the charcoals.And it wasn't always the case. I wore my 2002 Cool Greys all the time because they were comfortable.