Aquamanjay_
formerly jaylaw15
- 8,180
- 9,262
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2014
Don't argue with cuz who is clearly trolling. All 2015 releases were under the remaster program, even if you dont think they were remastered enough for your tastes
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
209 here :/I swear I paid 204 for My Hares which came in a remastered box.. Oan: they have Nike insoles and were more comfortable than previous 7s.
Don't argue with cuz who is clearly trolling. All 2015 releases were under the remaster program, even if you dont think they were remastered enough for your tastes
209 here :/
No doubt the prices were clearly "remastered" and a box hardly means anything in terms of what nike presented.I swear I paid 204 for My Hares which came in a remastered box.. Oan: they have Nike insoles and were more comfortable than previous 7s.
Trolling, nah.Don't argue with cuz who is clearly trolling. All 2015 releases were under the remaster program, even if you dont think they were remastered enough for your tastes
I read that when it was announced. What did you expect them to say? It's just more marketing gibberish man
Making false claims is illegal in the business world. Therefore I expected them to live up to their promise of better craftsmanship. However, it was quite the opposite.
But you keep buying tho
this. nike isnt putting a gun to your head.
The materials used for the same shoe vary widely, nothing really to do with the mold or shape of a particular model affecting the remaster label.So Nike is gonna use 2 different molds on the same shoe depending on color way? The original article I read about the remastered line, the person interviewed from Nik indicated the whole retro line would be remastered...
the article I was referring to is the original ************* article linked in the first post of the remastered thread. I also think the shoes released since have been better. Not saying everyone should be satisfied but I think there has been an improvement .The materials used for the same shoe vary widely, nothing really to do with the mold or shape of a particular model affecting the remaster label.So Nike is gonna use 2 different molds on the same shoe depending on color way? The original article I read about the remastered line, the person interviewed from Nik indicated the whole retro line would be remastered...
Are you referring to the sneakernews article that keeps being brought by the guy that started the remastered petition and complaint thread? If so, I read that and it never actually directly quotes any of the interviewees from Nike nor refers to any nike announcements or press release. It seems the writer takes it on his own and implies "all retros". It seems to me Nike marketing just let the incorrect word of mouth spread without the need to clarify their official position. All the shoes pictured in that article were miles better than most of the other retros released. The only press release I did find were in regards to this year's maroon vi and cement iv's which i can think most that bought them can agree can also match the shoes shown in that article in terms of quality.
No doubt the prices were clearly "remastered" and a box hardly means anything in terms of what nike presented.
Sorry, sneakerbardetroit or any other blog or website is hardly nike's official word. There's a reason shoes like the Hares on Nike release page (http://www.nike.com/us/en_us/launch/c/2015-05/air-jordan-7-retro-hare) leaves out the words "remastered" or "premium" while all the other shoes that were displayed as "remastered" explicity mentions those key words in their respective descriptions. http://www.nike.com/us/en_us/launch/n/apylZaptsZapu4?sortOrder=desc
Trolling, nah.
Afaik, nike never sent out any press release that "all 2015 releases " were supposed to be remastered. Can someone prove otherwise, cause the op, Steve is speaking in legalities and cases? An article on a sneakernews website or some hobby blogs without any official word or direct quotes from nike execs does not qualify as nike's, legally speaking.
Looking back at my own expenditures earlier, before 2015 I've annually spent over double of what I purchased in Nike/JB shoes before this so called "remaster initiative" started. 2016 for me has so far started even smaller. I let my wallet do the talking to nike.
Huh, who said anything about photographing or nike branding?No doubt the prices were clearly "remastered" and a box hardly means anything in terms of what nike presented.
Sorry, sneakerbardetroit or any other blog or website is hardly nike's official word. There's a reason shoes like the Hares on Nike release page (http://www.nike.com/us/en_us/launch/c/2015-05/air-jordan-7-retro-hare) leaves out the words "remastered" or "premium" while all the other shoes that were displayed as "remastered" explicity mentions those key words in their respective descriptions. http://www.nike.com/us/en_us/launch/n/apylZaptsZapu4?sortOrder=desc
Trolling, nah.
Afaik, nike never sent out any press release that "all 2015 releases " were supposed to be remastered. Can someone prove otherwise, cause the op, Steve is speaking in legalities and cases? An article on a sneakernews website or some hobby blogs without any official word or direct quotes from nike execs does not qualify as nike's, legally speaking.
Looking back at my own expenditures earlier, before 2015 I've annually spent over double of what I purchased in Nike/JB shoes before this so called "remaster initiative" started. 2016 for me has so far started even smaller. I let my wallet do the talking to nike.
So since Nike didn't photograph the Hare 7 colorway they weren't remastered???
Something was done here my guy call it what you want.... IMO they wouldn't use Nike branding if they weren't remastered...
This is like beating a dead horse..
Huh, who said anything about photographing or nike branding?
Ok, then reread my replies.Huh, who said anything about photographing or nike branding?
I bought that up. Just think about why I bought it up Fam..
Ok, then reread my replies.
Ok, then reread my replies.
It's not making any sense bro. Your saying because the Hares weren't mentioned in Nike remastering program that they aren't remastered.
To be fair, if it became a legal discussion, the fact that Nike didn't explicitly say they were remastered would give them an out.
If I'm thinking correctly. I think Nike unveiled the remastered initiative and had a list of remastered shoes.
To be fair, if it became a legal discussion, the fact that Nike didn't explicitly say they were remastered would give them an out.
If I'm thinking correctly. I think Nike unveiled the remastered initiative and had a list of remastered shoes.
That's something I missed... Could you J post this such list?
I'm too lazy. I thought and I express thought that the intro for the remastered stuff featured the legend blue and Oreo 4s as well as the French blue 7s.
I could be wrong tho and it's honestly a petty argument for everyone involved (including me) because we are just arguing semantics at this point. We know and knew what was good.
I'm too lazy. I thought and I express thought that the intro for the remastered stuff featured the legend blue and Oreo 4s as well as the French blue 7s.
I could be wrong tho and it's honestly a petty argument for everyone involved (including me) because we are just arguing semantics at this point. We know and knew what was good.
Your right.. I'm glad I got mine that's what matters. Appreciate you Fam
vintageog7
I wasn't trying to prove what was actually "remastered" or not but what nike may or may not be legally responsible for. I agree, the hares, bordeauxs or most other og retros do not need any remaster label to sell. These could've been worse, and I probably still would've copped.
Yes bigj505 that's all I was simply implying in response to the legal speak earlier and what nike kept open to interpretation. It is semantics.
What size are you?Meanwhile I'm still on the [emoji]128064[/emoji] for a pair.