- 68
- 10
Originally Posted by thebeast23
the OG's DID NOT HAVE 3M!!! LEARN YALL MATERIALS
What are those silver dots on the ankle of the ORIGINAL in the pic above your post then???
Air Jordan 6 Black/Infrared 1991 vs. 2000 vs. 2010 Comparison
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by halfyhalf,
- Start date
What are those silver dots on the ankle of the ORIGINAL in the pic above your post then???
- 1,518
- 10
bro u maaaaaad late kid. already settledOriginally Posted by rockwell666
Originally Posted by thebeast23
the OG's DID NOT HAVE 3M!!! LEARN YALL MATERIALS
What are those silver dots on the ankle of the ORIGINAL in the pic above your post then???
- 173
- 10
Love all 3 OG's have that leather heel which i think is a great touch.
young christin
Banned
- 536
- 10
All of them look great but the 2000 are the sexiest
- 968
- 10
its so obvious how the quality declined every 10 years
- 56,540
- 65,395
This is why I got a split pack with just the white ones
- 51
- 10
i would kill for the 200 retro's only vi's from 00 are the midnights thanks to dj am may he rest in peace
- 2,125
- 108
The OG's put even those retros to shame. Not even close the 2000 retros look like garbage to the OG's.ot a chance.
And most people who complain about quality are not concerned about a glue spot, I balled with my OG's in my rotaion for like 5 years thats how much I loved them as a kid, let me see any retro stand up to that punishment, not a chance.
And most people who complain about quality are not concerned about a glue spot, I balled with my OG's in my rotaion for like 5 years thats how much I loved them as a kid, let me see any retro stand up to that punishment, not a chance.
- 2,355
- 10
Can someone clear it up for me?
People keep saying that there is leather at the heel and i have always thought that it was how aged durabuck looked like
Ninjahood come clear this up for me
- 1,352
- 91
IMO 2000s look the best. thanks for posting
- 523
- 11
the latest dont look as good!..ponyboy
- 2,152
- 10
91's for me... but would prefer rocking the 2010 since its wearable...
- 955
- 10
the !!*! why is the og look like its leather
- 1,015
- 49
Still got the 2000's sitting on Ice. Grail Status. Never seen the OG's in person but they look Fyre.
marion706
Banned
- 1,589
- 10
l0ve the 20 1O's
- 32
- 10
HAS ANYONE NOTICED OTHER THAN MYSELF THAT THE TOEBOX IS ALSO DIFFERENT....THEIR WAS STAY PAPER IN THE TOE BOX IN 1991....STAY PAPER ACTS THE SAME WAY IT DOES IN A HEEL OF A SHOE....IT'S ALSO FOUND IN HATS....JB USED IT IN BOTH SIX, AND SEVEN'S....HOWEVER THEY DID NOT USE IT IN THE EIGHTS.....IF ANYONE OUT THERE OWNS BOTH OG'S AND RETROS PRESS DOWN ON THE TOE AND SEE FOR YOURSELF.
IF U HAVE OG'S I'D SUGGEST GLASS SHOWCASING THEM....IF U RESPECT THEM AT ALL U'LL STOP WEARING YOUR OG'S.
IF U HAVE OG'S I'D SUGGEST GLASS SHOWCASING THEM....IF U RESPECT THEM AT ALL U'LL STOP WEARING YOUR OG'S.
- 2,124
- 456
having owned both the OG's and the 00 retros, i can say that without even looking at the 2010's that they are probably farrrr inferior than the older ones.
the og's were nice in their own way, the red was more "neon" than the 00's and the 3M was a nice touch. the insoles were also like neon pink which was cool. the 00 retros were one of the most comfortable j's i've had as well. very light and flexible. the newest 6's i've had were the DMP blk/golds and those were so uncomfortable i sold it right away. it seems like JB is making shoes out of plastic than rubber and leather these days...
oh yea, and excellent post, thanks for the pics.
the og's were nice in their own way, the red was more "neon" than the 00's and the 3M was a nice touch. the insoles were also like neon pink which was cool. the 00 retros were one of the most comfortable j's i've had as well. very light and flexible. the newest 6's i've had were the DMP blk/golds and those were so uncomfortable i sold it right away. it seems like JB is making shoes out of plastic than rubber and leather these days...
oh yea, and excellent post, thanks for the pics.
- 2,124
- 456
and this guy probably never owned a pair of 00's. IMO the retros back in 00-01 era were made with just as much, if not more quality than og's. JB was not just a money making company back then. i've had ds 94 3's, og 5's, ds og infrared 6's, og hare 7's, og 10's, and og 11's. they were def. not some god-like quality that everyone thinks they were. also, i've owned almost all the retros that came out around 99-01 and they honestly looked better and fit better than the OG's. unfortunately, it seems like even the 99-01 retros can't be worn with confidence these days due to the cracking so it's a shame...
- 3,969
- 535
Guess you don't own them, because the quality is actually the worst!
Not only is the shape not good for people who have a flat food, the midsole paintjob
is the worst i've ever experienced. Especially the black painting at the heel cracks and chips like crazy.
But the AJ 6 retro in white/midnight navy from 2000 is even worse: the blue painting was peeling off
during my first wearing and i did not ball in them!
The 2010 might be looking off because it uses different upper and the varsity red is definetly darker
than the infared (also Jumpman instead of Nike Air) but the quality is closer to the OG than the 2000 retro.
- 909
- 12
