I agree, because the elephant print on my pairs are all thin. To even want the cuts more thinner is crazy, because at that point, the elephant print on the 3,s wouldn't even be noticeable that much. Back to the 5,s, the last 2016 retro was actually decent and good in my perspective. There could've been minor tweaks here and there, tomake them somewhat perfect. But judging by these comments, it would have you thinking that they were trash.
Flame Suit on, but the 2020 Fire Reds were perfection to me, from a execution standpoint. That's one of my favorites though. The only improvement, is if they would've used premium top notch Italian leather on them, which we know that a retro wont get.
With that being said, like ive said before, alot of yall are complaining are just complaining for the sake of complaining. I believe that we could get a few 1 of 1 retro,s like the upcoming Bred 85 OG 1,s coming out in 2025, and the majority of yall would still complain about something.
Also, Nike/Jordan Brand could definitely shoot themselves in the foot in the future, with the reshaping of the 3,s and 5,s once again. They'll probably make the toe box of the 5,s with a way more round, over the top shape, similar to the reimagined 4,s blk/cement toe box shape.
I wouldnt be mad at that. But if the reshaping of the upcoming Blk/Cement 3,s consists of having barely noticeable elephant print, in which the elephant print will be even lower than the reimagined 3,s. I wont be feeling that at all. I say that, because alot of the OG 3,s pairs did have super low elephant print, almost to the point, that it was barely noticeable to the eye. It looked like a thin grey line with specs of black cuts on it.
I can see them unintentionally retooling the shape on the 5,s and 3,s so much, to the point the shoes would look drastically different than what we consider normal. Im calling it now, since they're messing with the shapes again, we're getting paper thin elephant prints on the black cement 3,s.
