- 22,123
- 69,951
Air Jordan 4 "What The" 11/13/19
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by drewswish,
- Start date
- 23,858
- 48,232
- 22,629
- 29,272
They go well together in a uniform, but then clash? Contradicted himself in the same damn statement lol.
- 6,192
- 4,276
I guess no true blues then
- 33,427
- 39,199
It's not even close, plus the toebox shape is way better on these.
- 7,634
- 9,686
Military blues, right? True Blues have been retro-ed multiple times.
- 22,123
- 69,951
The leather they used on the white cements 
I'd do em dirty if they aint have that Nike Air
I'd do em dirty if they aint have that Nike Air
- 17,191
- 23,442
Leather on the 2016 white cement was a huge upgrade from the brick 2012 tho 
so if MJ would have worn military blues with a Chicago uniform it would have gone well together? what im saying is on certain uniforms its not bad because its a uniform. but even on a uniform the colors clash. uniforms are not everyday fashion so its different to me.
- 22,123
- 69,951
Matching head to toe is trash.
- 1,486
- 4,050
- 6,192
- 4,276
I Was just referencing some blue and red shoes
- 1,486
- 4,050
- 18,192
- 27,334
- 5,262
- 6,887
I don't really get what people are talking about wrt to the toebox. Slimmer rand, yes, but WC has a much better overall slant. These are way more boxy, but still better than a lot of other 4s from the past.
Obviously leather on these is way better. I do prefer the speckle density ;-) of the back tab and wings on the WC...heh. And the military back tab NA somehow looks even more off, even though it's the same as the WC; just the color contrast I suppose.
Happy to have these. If they go on discount later I will hit up Nike for a partial refund/price match. These will NEVER retro these, so they will be one of a kind down the road.
Obviously leather on these is way better. I do prefer the speckle density ;-) of the back tab and wings on the WC...heh. And the military back tab NA somehow looks even more off, even though it's the same as the WC; just the color contrast I suppose.
Happy to have these. If they go on discount later I will hit up Nike for a partial refund/price match. These will NEVER retro these, so they will be one of a kind down the road.
- 7,634
- 9,686
Concur on the NEVER retro, I plan to slowly purchase 4-5 pairs total.
- 53
- 31
Anyone else’s pair smell horrible? The glue is overbearing
- 10,322
- 8,215
I'm at work taking a break, I'm so glad I was in the break room alone that last page had me dying
.
.
KanyIZZY
formerly j o 19
- 18,650
- 49,507
As I was typing this, I changed my mind and I disagree.. they will eventually retro these. I really want to say they won't because I categorize shoes like these as a 1 off like collabs. But everything gets retro'd now.. even DMP VI's.
- 18,192
- 27,334
Got a $15 off coupon at foot action. Tempted to double up and grab a pair from there if still available in my size.
- 10,322
- 8,215
If they gave the DB collection a retro or re release. Whatever you want to call it anything is possible
- 22,123
- 69,951
I disagree.
I dont think these will be retroed at all.
I dont think these will be retroed at all.
- 17,191
- 23,442
Retro’ing non OG or non sought out colorways is odd
- 4,118
- 24,025
I'm on the fence. I wanted them, now I'm like should I just get the Bred 11's early instead
- 5,262
- 6,887
Not a valid decision ;-). The 11s will be available; it makes no sense to pay over retail until after launch. Even months after launch as there will be restocks. If you're on the fence and don't see yourself wearing them, just don't get them. 4s are my goat silhouette, and I love these, so happy to have them! Or get the from Nike, get them in-hand, wear them, and see how you like them. If you don't, return them within 30 days.
