- 38,855
- 77,440
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2008
Think they would just say it was WC 4's if it was
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
2011/2012 I believe
Them ugly a** payless plastic looking 2012 joints
Feel like this will definitely be a reverse colorway or a collaboration. The only reason JB brings back a shoe in 5 years or less is because of the Nike Air heel (2014-2019 infrared 6) or bad quality (2013-2017 Royals).
Better leather quality, padding, and cut on the latest ones. The banned 1s from 2013 are almost completely different than the 2017s2013 Breds, Shadows, and Black Toes were bad quality?
Better leather quality, padding, and cut on the latest ones. The banned 1s from 2013 are almost completely different than the 2017s
2013 1's wasn't Banned 1'sBetter leather quality, padding, and cut on the latest ones. The banned 1s from 2013 are almost completely different than the 2017s
Meant to say 2016Different than the 2017 Flyknit Banneds? I think that was the point lol
Say what about the 2016 WC netting?close netting in the wrong direction.
2012What was the last WC4 retro before the 2016s?
I have 3 too, but I'd be in for 2 or 3 more of these lolIf they drop...sweet....if not...I’m G.
^People are gassing those Flint XIII’s too...
Those ain’t Flint XIII’s. Those are BASED on Flint XIIIs.
Other’s can be more specific when it comes to their retro’s. Diff strokes diff folks.