- 3,102
- 574
- Joined
- May 11, 2008
I found the fire red IV to be more comfortable than my black cement IV.
Same. The leather is nice and soft on those. Both very comfortable shoes though.
Really? I might have to check those out
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
I found the fire red IV to be more comfortable than my black cement IV.
Same. The leather is nice and soft on those. Both very comfortable shoes though.
You aren't alone...It's known to chip. Some shoes were even chipped already straight out the box if you look closely on some of the bad quality pairs.I recently undsed these and the paint is chipping after 3 wears. I love this shoe but I'm so disappointed. Am I the only one?
I recently undsed these and the paint is chipping after 3 wears. I love this shoe but I'm so disappointed. Am I the only one?
^ Yeah, It's only a matter of time. Why would JB not cash in at $200 a pop for something so simple?
A lot of guys have complained about pinky toe problems. I suggest you make a trip to your local grocery outlet. For $8.99, your problems could be solved.
These pairs were my first test subjects. My latest pair that needed widening was a pair of AT1 chlorophylls.
Only my right foot though...
BTW, BinYe..you a wild one!
Nubuck > Durabuck.
A fellow poster here attempted to debate with me as to the durability and shape-rentention/creasability
of nu. versus dura.
The playoff/raptor VII's from 2012 and thunder IV's from 2012 = both durabuck and look worn after a few wears (which is
fine, not complaining because that's expected).
The black red V's from 2011, the Varsity red VI's from 2010 and the bred IV's 2012 - all nubuck and to
this day, toe boxes are as immaculate as ever.
Yes, durabuck looks and feels gooder, but long term, i'd rather stick it to the nu-nu.
i think Jordan brand stopped using quality material in 2007 because my XIV's Feel really nice
You lost all credibility by using anything post 2008 as an example of quality.
Anyway, durabuck... nubuck, whatever JB wants to call it, it isn't the same **** they were using back in the day. It's just different, at JB selling "fools gold".
Nubuck > Durabuck.
A fellow poster here attempted to debate with me as to the durability and shape-rentention/creasability
of nu. versus dura.
The playoff/raptor VII's from 2012 and thunder IV's from 2012 = both durabuck and look worn after a few wears (which is
fine, not complaining because that's expected).
The black red V's from 2011, the Varsity red VI's from 2010 and the bred IV's 2012 - all nubuck and to
this day, toe boxes are as immaculate as ever.
Yes, durabuck looks and feels gooder, but long term, i'd rather stick it to the nu-nu.
.
Wear Skinny Jeans...I have blue stains from my jeans on the jumpman logo on the heel and the gray lace eyelet things. Anyone else have this issue and any solutions??
prewash your jeansI have blue stains from my jeans on the jumpman logo on the heel and the gray lace eyelet things. Anyone else have this issue and any solutions??
Nubuck > Durabuck.
A fellow poster here attempted to debate with me as to the durability and shape-rentention/creasability
of nu. versus dura.
The playoff/raptor VII's from 2012 and thunder IV's from 2012 = both durabuck and look worn after a few wears (which is
fine, not complaining because that's expected).
The black red V's from 2011, the Varsity red VI's from 2010 and the bred IV's 2012 - all nubuck and to
this day, toe boxes are as immaculate as ever.
Yes, durabuck looks and feels gooder, but long term, i'd rather stick it to the nu-nu.
.
Gooder?
I have blue stains from my jeans on the jumpman logo on the heel and the gray lace eyelet things. Anyone else have this issue and any solutions??