- Apr 18, 2006
- 4,391
- 13,159
All i see is. Yeezy 380
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If this is the only one you aren’t buying due to the cut of the shoe, then I wonder what you think the cut of pretty much every Air Jordan is. They are almost all about this same height.Oh well..looks like the first Air Jordan model I will not own. Cannot stand low top sneakers and all these brands keep making shoes lower and lower.
Better than the last couple of designs, which is not saying much, but still a miss
AE1s and the Hardens and the upcoming Dames look so much better.
Not sure if this was posted but here is an interview with 2 of the J39 designers. Seems like a bunch of BS was put into this project. These joints look like the Melo Balls.
I've been saying it for years, it's enough already with the Jumpman logo.If I'm not mistaken there was a couple JB/Nike designers that moved over to the stripes and everyone kinda forgot about it because adidas didn't immediately drop heat....looks like they found their way after a couple of years.
Adidas is taking risks and aren't leaning on much stripes history, perhaps in the next decade of Jordan Brand they should lean a little less on Jordan history and try more new things
Photoshop yeezy 380 alien and the mist colowayIf anyone would like a black \ red photoshop, Lmk the desired color placement and I'll start it.
We need to retire “trash” as an adjective to describe sneakers. It’s lost all meaning. Good on the court but not the best looking? Trash. Beautiful but bad on the court? Trash. Look good, play good, but not as good as XYZ model? Trash. I don’t even know what the word means anymore.Agreed.
37s and 38s were trash.
Underrated shoe and colorway.I am a big Paolo fan but a 22 and 7 guy debuting Jordan’s is wild….
They turned this upside down
We need to retire “trash” as an adjective to describe sneakers. It’s lost all meaning. Good on the court but not the best looking? Trash. Beautiful but bad on the court? Trash. Look good, play good, but not as good as XYZ model? Trash. I don’t even know what the word means anymore.
37’s and 38’s weren’t my favorite, but I played in the 37 for a year now in two color wars and they were perfectly fine to me even if there are better options out there. It’s decent. Not all time great, but not trash, either.
I’m good with that. What was the point of any resemblance at all on the 38 just to not release the OG 8 cws? Total travesty. This shoe isn’t impressive but at least it’s not going to disappoint in the same waySo no resemblance to the 9's?