- Mar 29, 2001
- 22,754
- 72,417
I was gon say, cats ain’t count them FT3 or Timberlake joints as OG retros
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oh I agree they need to drop more OGs annually. Where I disagree is that they could certainty drop classic retros true to spec and give us some sample variations on them.Because if we're being honest Nike needs to speed up the retro cycle of classic colorways. It's gotten to the point where they only give us a handful of actual OG's a year with a million plus throwaway retro +'s no one asked for.
For example in 2013 JB gave us 15 OG releases ranging through different models, in addition to retro+'s. Fast forward to 2023 we got 5, 6 if you include the suede Royals. The scale has tipped too far to new colorways.
How many different ways are you going to put UNC blue on a Jordan 1 high without just giving us the OG's? They're milking it.
I wouldn’t count a suede or nubuck version as OG retro myself either. Like those reimagined IVs are not an OG retro to me. That’s a variant. Just as the FT lines and JTs are variants.I was gon say, cats ain’t count them FT3 or Timberlake joints as OG retros
I wouldn’t count a suede or nubuck version as OG retro myself either. Like those reimagined IVs are not an OG retro to me. That’s a variant. Just as the FT lines and JTs are variants.
I’m making plenty of sense. The JT’s and FT’s all came in the normal time frame expected between retros, if not extending it out for the reimagined plan. Point being you got the retro in 2011 and got a variant every 2-3 years.You're not making sense now.
He said that, because you were trying to state that JB has released an OG retro as well as a close-to-OG-retro close together several times. ie: the Chicago Jordan 1's.
However we're not getting on OG Black/Red 4 with the reimagined release, and we didn't get an OG White/Cement 3 with the Free Throw Lines or Jt3's.
LETS GO SUEDE BABY.These need to only exist as a sample.
The problem is technically neither one of those should be considered done 100% “correctly”. The reimagined BC3 is not going to be a true OG retro with it coming with an aged midsole. I’m fine with it but that’s just a fact. I know it’s hard (especially with the reimagined 3s) but we can’t let JB off the hook by accepting any of the reimagined pairs as true OG retros cause they’re not.Again, what would be so bad about these dropping with the current shape? The issue is these either/or scenarios. Give us the BC3 correctly this year and next year drop the sample version. Real collectors and fans of the model can get the shoe and if you’re not either then you can keep it moving without being offended the brand gave you some inadequate substitute.
The problem is technically neither one of those should be considered done 100% “correctly”. The reimagined BC3 is not going to be a true OG retro with it coming with an aged sole. I’m fine with it but that’s just a fact. I know it’s hard (especially with the reimagined 3s) but we can’t let JB off the hook by accepting any of the reimagined pairs as true OG retros cause they’re not.
The reimagined WC3 is closer to og than the 2018 or even 2001 BC3. It really comes down to which details you think are most important. Huge differences in shape/overall design vs a slight difference in midsole color.The problem is technically neither one of those should be considered done 100% “correctly”. The reimagined BC3 is not going to be a true OG retro with it coming with an aged sole. I’m fine with it but that’s just a fact. I know it’s hard (especially with the reimagined 3s) but we can’t let JB off the hook by accepting any of the reimagined pairs as true OG retros cause they’re not.
Honestly the WC3 reimagined has to be the top when it comes to modern retro releases. Aged look or no, it is pretty damn good. But thats my view. In the 2000s at least, they have never made a perfect retro by design as you know. A select few come close though.Has there really never been a retro that was identical to the OG?
From any brand?
To me, its the Black infra 6 from 1991. In my view nothing beats those.I dunno about identical but I’d kill to go back in time and drop another $64 on a future size 11 of 94 Chicago 1’s. Still the best Jordan I ever owned 300+ shoes later
Those samples are over a decade oldI’d pass if it’s suede but the steel toe and thick print is the bigger issue on those samples
Yea I know. Just sayin.Those samples are over a decade old
That all may be true. In fact I agree with you but wouldn’t a version exactly like the WC3 reimagined *without a slight difference in midsole color (I.e. a plain white midsole like the original) be even closer to the OG? Point is JB knows what they’re doing. With certain shoes they give us everything we want, except for one thing. You know it’s done to keep us coming back.The reimagined WC3 is closer to og than the 2018 or even 2001 BC3. It really comes down to which details you think are most important. Huge differences in shape/overall design vs a slight difference in midsole color.