- 614
- 13
I don't think they will call next year's sig the XXV's because there is no XXIV's.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Originally Posted by Beelzebub23
Originally Posted by phaze1123
Everything he has touched has been well received.
Not the XV.
Yo Meth, if you got off on the 23rd stop and the 25th anniversary shoe turn out pretty nice, you will go back to 2009.
Not a chance. I'm not buying an ugly, overpriced sneaker for the sake of continuity in a meaningless collection. The shoes I do own,I've purchased because I actually like them.
My point is that the Jordan line no longer holds any special meaning for me. Growing up, we all eagerly anticipated the new Air Jordan. It was, with preciousfew exceptions, the shoe to own that year.
Those days are over. Now, it's just one of 3,000 releases from nike/jordan, it has to contend with half the Jordan back catalog via retros, there's noreal build-up of anticipation prior to the release, and seeing Chris Paul, Ray Allen, and Joe Johnson wearing them in the All Star game is anti-climactic.
It's no longer the industry's flagship product - it's just another shoe and as much as I appreciate the 23 from an aesthetic standpoint and approveof its efforts, however halfhearted, to incorporate environmentally sustainable materials and construction, I've grown sick of what the line has become. It's no longer the best basketball shoe money can buy. It's difficult to consider the product sophisticated in terms of styling cues when they allfeature white plastic with an irridescent, rainbow sheen, they're obsessed with exploiting artificial scarcity (titaniums, etc.) to try and hustle up fakehype, and the products are, by and large, backward-looking rather than forward thinking - bent on recreating past glories rather than taking the basketballshoe, functionally and aesthetically, to the next level.
I just don't foresee this shoe bringing anything to the table that I, as an Air Jordan fan since the pre-championship Bulls days, give a damn about.
If you create a great looking, sophisticated, innovative, high performance basketball shoe that's ethical and responsible in its materials and productionmethods - I'll buy it. I don't care who makes it. I don't care what the name of it is. My confidence in Jordan brand's ability to createsuch a shoe, though, is at an all time low. So, the fact that Tinker may co-design an Air Jordan XXV hasn't exactly rendered me giddy with anticipation. To me, the line is effectively over until otherwise proven.
My collection feels quite complete without the 2009, thanks, and I have no intention of buying a XXV just because Tinker's involved. If they handcuff himthe way they handcuffed Jason Mayden, there's no way the next model will be anything but a disappointment, relegated to the shadows beneath a steaming pileof rehashed and remixed retros.
Originally Posted by mjmoney23
There is two hints in that post:
The first being Tinker is back for the 25.
The second, that he is not alone. There will be some kind of codesigner, ala the real mccoys will not be happy.
Originally Posted by NY GIANTS 11
Going back to jays is like going back to the woman who has cheated on you.
And cheated with an UGLY dude (think fusion)