- 510
- 11
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2007
nothing special bout the shoe. looked like and1's.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Originally Posted by pstuart13
it has a high heel on it!!!
All those sneakers are better than the 2009. Hence the fact we were complaining about the price, because it was not worth it.Originally Posted by SHUGES
I really wish people would stop saying "it's the price".
Penny foam 1s just sold the hell out in purple.
1/2 cents just sold the hell out in both colorways.
The AJ XX3 moved fast in most of the colorways.
And ALL of those sneakers were close to or more than the Jordan 2009 in price.
The price may have played a part in the shoe not selling.
But best believe the reason the sales were slow was more because it was an UGLY shoe than anything else.
Originally Posted by tz85
i love my black pair
well said. I didnt mind paying 185 for the XX3. Not cause it was the last numbered jordan, but because it looked good and felt good.Originally Posted by JinKazama
For the most part people didn't like the looks. At a reasonable price, true j heads would have copped and let them grow on them..but for $190.00 and with the economy the way it is cats just revolted.
Maybe JB will learn from this. Not so much to lower prices (cause they won't), but to know that if you expect us to come off $185, $190, $200...you better come with that heat!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Originally Posted by STARZ
not the fact that its not numberd, just the fact that its ugly, no bamf colorway's, and the retail price 190+ tax. you really think we were going to buy them? is it so hard for jb to make a shoe that plays, feels, and looks good?!
well theres your answer from me.
exactly what i did got em on the cheap and they did grow on me.but that heel is terrible thoughOriginally Posted by JinKazama
For the most part people didn't like the looks. At a reasonable price, true j heads would have copped and let them grow on them..but for $190.00 and with the economy the way it is cats just revolted.
Maybe JB will learn from this. Not so much to lower prices (cause they won't), but to know that if you expect us to come off $185, $190, $200...you better come with that heat!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Originally Posted by ROBPZEE612
i like'em but the price ain't rite
Originally Posted by GreyScaleMethod
The shoe is ugly period. It suffers from a price issue and lack of colorway creativity. I guess $70 is an ok price, I just wouldn't spend it on them especially when I can use the $70 for some real heat. Shoe might perform well, but it looks like something Converse should of put out.