- 25
- 10
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2009
thumbs up on these... when do they hit?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Originally Posted by Magic1978
They're ok for basketball I guess
Originally Posted by Magic1978
They're ok for basketball I guess
Originally Posted by elcerrito91
Originally Posted by bwood056
Originally Posted by d e beatup
Then people would moan and complain why they're paying$160$175 for a pair of 2s that look exactly like the $135 joints. I personally don't like the idea; think it's a lazy copout but I can totally understand it from a strategic business standpoint, just like I hate fusions and totally understand the moneymaker they became.
The only shoe I would like to see this on is the XVIs since it would just be an improvement on the already-there vis-air.
yeah but now u are basing the "buying" of the shoe solely off of looks.
when the 2's originally came out, it was an advanced basketball shoe.
times change.
but the look of the shoe is classic, so putting a nice simple air unit in it = upgrade of BBall performance.
its not a drastic change, just to the performance of the shoe.
i for one HATE fusions with a passion
BUT these are a well executed change to keep up with the ever growing performance enhancing shoes.
I agree, its updated for today's basketball scene. What is the problem, they still look good. Just because it isnt hyped or limited doesnt mean its bad. Fusions were done solely for sneakerheads/ average Jordan consumer imo, where as this is done for basketball players.
Originally Posted by elcerrito91
Originally Posted by bwood056
Originally Posted by d e beatup
Then people would moan and complain why they're paying$160$175 for a pair of 2s that look exactly like the $135 joints. I personally don't like the idea; think it's a lazy copout but I can totally understand it from a strategic business standpoint, just like I hate fusions and totally understand the moneymaker they became.
The only shoe I would like to see this on is the XVIs since it would just be an improvement on the already-there vis-air.
yeah but now u are basing the "buying" of the shoe solely off of looks.
when the 2's originally came out, it was an advanced basketball shoe.
times change.
but the look of the shoe is classic, so putting a nice simple air unit in it = upgrade of BBall performance.
its not a drastic change, just to the performance of the shoe.
i for one HATE fusions with a passion
BUT these are a well executed change to keep up with the ever growing performance enhancing shoes.
I agree, its updated for today's basketball scene. What is the problem, they still look good. Just because it isnt hyped or limited doesnt mean its bad. Fusions were done solely for sneakerheads/ average Jordan consumer imo, where as this is done for basketball players.
Originally reported as the Air Jordan 2 Max, but the official name is the Air Jordan 2.0. You can thank Jordan Brand for clearing up the name mix-up. As for the release of the updated Air Jordan 2, the Air Jordan 2.0 is currently set to hit stores on June 4, 2011. Retail is $160.
theshoegame
Originally reported as the Air Jordan 2 Max, but the official name is the Air Jordan 2.0. You can thank Jordan Brand for clearing up the name mix-up. As for the release of the updated Air Jordan 2, the Air Jordan 2.0 is currently set to hit stores on June 4, 2011. Retail is $160.
theshoegame