- 19,057
- 9,030
Not arguing that
Air Jordan 11 Space Jam-December 10, 2016-$220
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by jays25,
- Start date
- 1,001
- 437
Honestly I liked the '09s. Yeah the patent cut wasn't right but the 23 and blue Jumpman make up for that. I sold them for $300 though back in '14 so I got to rock them for free for 5 years. They were still in great condition. Still haven't tried on my 45s. Just took them out of the box to smell them and take some pics. I gotta enjoy them before the soles start to yellow. Probably won't be this year though.
- 6,359
- 8,715
rbk93
Supporter
- 14,135
- 13,388
Sizing was off. Cool Grey XIs was an improvement, but don't think they got it right until the Concords.
The Fresh Prince
formerly airsakuragi
- 13,534
- 9,570
Not sure how the blue Jumpman makes up for anything considering it's not the original color of the shoes from 1995.
rbk93
Supporter
- 14,135
- 13,388
The only thing that made this latest retro special is that it was a PE. Now that's it's widely available, it's close to nothing now.
- 244
- 104
Maybe the shoe just looks good on GP and if someone wants it they can buy it? Calling it next to nothing because it had multiple restocked makes you sound insecure
rbk93
Supporter
- 14,135
- 13,388
You know what I mean. The same applies to multiple colorways.
- 3,562
- 2,813
i think EVERYONE in the world could own the jams, they will never stop being iconic, I mean we might have lost the looney tunes, and MJ isn't goat if he's taken to moron mountain
- 10,625
- 23,543
You are right. They will always be an iconic shoe.i think EVERYONE in the world could own the jams, they will never stop being iconic, I mean we might have lost the looney tunes, and MJ isn't goat if he's taken to moron mountain
- 10,625
- 23,543
And I think everyone that wants them should have them.
- 1,001
- 437
I know it's not the original color. Still looked fresh. Also prefer the 23 on the heel instead of the 45 even if it was on a PE.
dhtowng
Supporter
- 9,892
- 20,643
The PL was not "too high". They made and executed these perfectly. I won't let y'all down talk a good thing. JB hit these out the park and that's something that can rarely be said.
rbk93
Supporter
- 14,135
- 13,388
Just saying from pics, it looks slightly higher than the OG patent leather cut. I don't mind it though.
- 19,057
- 9,030
Lookin at mjs, they def were higher than the original pe
And no one was sayin it in a bad way just stating a fact. On feet they def look better than past retros
- 1,136
- 1,035
- 6,874
- 2,805
Patent cut was not higher, these SJs were perfect.
- 6,359
- 8,715
Does this PL cut look even higher than the SJs to anyone else? or is it just cause of the contrast with the white
- 19,057
- 9,030
- 5
- 0
I'm straight on those midnight navy's, I think I'll pass. I'd rather wait for the Christmas drop and see if they really do QS the taxis
- 19,057
- 9,030
Yea I don't need them but if there isn't anything else I'll prolly cop the 11s
- 737
- 626
nahh, if these were perfect, I woulda bought a pair. far from it
- 8,070
- 5,047
Those Navys are flawless. The shape/PL cut/PL color. That shoe is beautiful. I'm in.
Do the SJs fit the same as the 12' Bred 11s? I'm getting back into Js and noticing that size 12 is now loose on my feet. Had to go 11.5 on 13's, 1's and 4's It's like everything is running a .5 size bigger. Seems like a shift happened in sizing between 2013-2015. So, I was hoping to pick up SJ's since I missed this release. Thanks for the help.
- 7,044
- 6,632
11.5 is my TTS. Went with size 12 on the 2012 Breds were perfect for me, with this year's SJ, I went with 11.5 and they were just right.
