Air Jordan 11 Space Jam-December 10, 2016-$220

[bigmixx11]

View media item 2260230 Yall can keep that low patent. This is what a Jordan 11 is supposed to look like

 

[aj11fan]

Back then I bought the 2009s and a week later I replaced them with the 2000s

You guys can have those if they release like that again :x

This version reminds me of these

View media item 2260233

 

[justed381]

Insole on these isn't great so switched out these for the insoles in the black metallic V's. Much more comfortable.

 

[skip2mefil]

still w8in on shoe palace shippin confirmation

 

[skip2mefil]

dub post

 

[crunchnmunch]

Here's some of 95/96 og 11s Jordan wore with lowcut patented leather

View media item 2260186View media item 2260187View media item 2260188View media item 2260189

Most OGs PL were cut high-it was one of the shoes characteristics. Not every pair was cut perfect. In the Photos, MJ is wearing a size 13 OG. Here's a pic of my size 13 OG. Note the PL is nicely cut and sitting high as it is supposed to.

View media item 2260235

 

[dagr814life23]

Those the special edition space jams?

LMAO! I actually laughed out loud.

Took a quick on foot pic..man these are comfortable 

 

 

[crunchnmunch]

If you look closely in the photos, the pair MJ is wearing is a high cut. It's the angle the shot was taken, but not as high as the new SJ, but it is almost identical to mine. Photography can be tricky at a distance.

 

[scoop0625]

Doubled up on this release and brought a size 5.5 for my girlfriend's sister for her Christmas present (not pictured).

View media item 2260221

From left to right: 2016, 2009 & 2000

View media item 2260223

Group shot...

View media item 2260225

Patent leather cut comparison to the black and red OG's...

View media item 2260228

With all that said, they did this shoe right. I'm glad that they stitched the "45" on the back as opposed to the screen print. The patent leather cut is . It is even higher than the OG's . Finally, they got the jumpman on the left shoe facing the correct direction since the 2001 black/reds. This is the golden standard on how AJ11's should be done.

 

[Magic33]

View media item 2259940

Why do long time members keep commenting on this as if it's an actual pic?

You guys more than anyone should know @jayzrdead is one of the people on the board who photoshops different colorways.

I swear some of you dudes complain just to complain and you complain so much that you don't even think before doing it.

 

[crunchnmunch]

Doubled up on this release and brought a size 5.5 for my girlfriend's sister for her Christmas present (not pictured).

View media item 2260221

From left to right: 2016, 2009 & 2000

View media item 2260223

Group shot...

View media item 2260225

Patent leather cut comparison to the black and red OG's...

View media item 2260228

With all that said, they did this shoe right. I'm glad that they stitched the "45" on the back as opposed to the screen print. The patent leather cut is . It is even higher than the OG's . Finally, they got the jumpman on the left shoe facing the correct direction since the 2001 black/reds. This is the golden standard on how AJ11's should be done.

Nice! My compliments!

 

[crunchnmunch]

Scoop, thanks for the side by side shot. I was right when I had the SJ in hand-the PL does sit higher than the OGs like I stated earlier.

 

[lew ashby]

This version reminds me of these

View media item 2260233

Wow repped, had these when they came out. Balled in them on my Jr High team- they were 93-94 or some ****

 

[babyjs23]

It's a discussion forum.

Opinions and comments tend to happen whether something is real, rumor, PS, etc. thus the term Nike[size=14pt]talk[/size]

 

[617collector]

Release of the year.

 

[Magic33]

It's a discussion forum.

Opinions and comments tend to happen whether something is real, rumor, PS, etc. thus the term Nike[size=14pt]talk[/size]

Thanks Mr Mod.

And I'm allowed to comment and give my opinion for people to keep saying they aren't getting them.

 

[pmpdaddyrobford]

small group


they weren't originally a detail but just a flaw in how they cut the leather in the process of it. I just find it silly to want to see an ugly flaw like that.

AND THATS FINE IF YOU FEEL THAT WAY.. AND HOW DO YOU KNOW HOW BIG OR SMALL THE GROUP IS .. WHOLE LOT OF GENERALIZATIONS IN WHAT YOURE SAYING. BUT AGAIN.. I DONT SEE WHY ANYONE WOULD DO THAT.. DONT LIKE IT DONT GET EM.. BUT ITS YOUR MONEY DO WHAT YOU WANT.

I have them in hand. The peaks are huge, they ain't small

 

[scoop0625]

Scoop, thanks for the side by side shot. I was right when I had the SJ in hand-the PL does sit higher than the OGs like I stated earlier.

Thanks fam. I couldn't believe it until I pick up my pairs on Saturday. In addition, the spacejams are size 10.5 and the OG's are size 11, so that is very telling.

 

[babyjs23]

Thanks Mr Mod.

And I'm allowed to comment and give my opinion for people to keep saying they aren't getting them.

You asked, got an answer, and now you're getting bent?

It's not that srs.

 

[kilroythedon]

It's a discussion forum.

Opinions and comments tend to happen whether something is real, rumor, PS, etc. thus the term Niketalk

Out here speaking truths as usual. 

 

[aj11fan]

If you look closely in the photos, the pair MJ is wearing is a high cut. It's the angle the shot was taken, but not as high as the new SJ, but it is almost identical to mine. Photography can be tricky at a distance.

I'm not saying every pair was exactly the same in PL cut. Some were higher some were lower:

View media item 2260239View media item 2260240View media item 2260241View media item 2260242

Even the PL low og werent that high

View media item 2260243

 

[kingcurt1]

So in conclusion back in the day no one was comparing cuts, they just wore the dang shoe because they liked the look....see it aint gotta be technical

 

[kilroythedon]

lol they coulda butchered space jams and I still woulda did em just cause they space jams.

 

[Deleted member 42060]

eastbay is knocked out

 

[babyjs23]

.