- 2,715
- 9,056
- Joined
- Nov 7, 2014
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
As far as next years holiday XI, Jumpman has 1 of 2 options. They can either drop the all Red Melo pair OR they can bring back the Concords. However, just like the're giving us #45 SpaceJams, they need to switch up the Concords just a lil' bit if they bring them back out. How do they switch them up you may ask? Remember, it's all in the details. DMP baby...
View media item 2073714
I want to see the retail pair. I theorize that we get the 2000 pl cut. Early GM UA pairs always have better cuts we want, buy Jb always gives us what they'll give us
I want to see the retail pair. I theorize that we get the 2000 pl cut. Early GM UA pairs always have better cuts we want, buy Jb always gives us what they'll give us
the motorsport 4s are coming out and those amonh the rarest and collector's gems. Anything can be released again, especial if jb wants to cash outThose DMPs so beautiful. That gold Jumpman fits the shoe better than the regular black. I don't think we'll see them again though. They have collector value and most likely both pairs including the DMP VIs will be one offs.
except here is what happened. wrong colors and released after the OG'si feel like whatever released to the public 1st(while jordan was playing) is an og..everything before is a PE...or PE OG..ok i give up
okay but there are some people saying the shoe IS totally different...some people in here are even convinced the december release is not a space jam its a PE..so to two people..the shoe could be different to each person..which is very weird. to one person a space jam and to the other a PE lol..idk at the end of the day theres an OG(very first release ever of a certain shoe)...then theres an OG colorway( like some saying that 2011 concord was an OG release would wrong but could say it was OG colorway release..BUT where is the line drawn...even though jordan wore the cool grey 11s with the wizards they are not considered OG because they did not come out in 95/96? its just simply a new colorway?except here is what happened. wrong colors and released after the OG's
what what in the butt, these are so nice!
I need to see these on feet!what what in the butt, these are so nice!
I need to see these on feet!
As far as next years holiday XI, Jumpman has 1 of 2 options. They can either drop the all Red Melo pair OR they can bring back the Concords. However, just like the're giving us #45 SpaceJams, they need to switch up the Concords just a lil' bit if they bring them back out. How do they switch them up you may ask? Remember, it's all in the details. DMP baby...
View media item 2073714
View media item 2074016
This is something that falls into the category of things I didn't know I wanted until someone mentioned it.
Bill murray wore some 2s in the game against the monstars. Those are space jams also? -_-
Ima throw up with this nonsense in here
okay but there are some people saying the shoe IS totally different...some people in here are even convinced the december release is not a space jam its a PE..so to two people..the shoe could be different to each person..which is very weird. to one person a space jam and to the other a PE lol..idk at the end of the day theres an OG(very first release ever of a certain shoe)...then theres an OG colorway( like some saying that 2011 concord was an OG release would wrong but could say it was OG colorway release..BUT where is the line drawn...even though jordan wore the cool grey 11s with the wizards they are not considered OG because they did not come out in 95/96? its just simply a new colorway?except here is what happened. wrong colors and released after the OG's
if you say the OG cool greys it might piss people off when you might not mean to.. when you are simply trying to reference the first time the cool grey 11s released(2001) rather than refereing it to an original colorway )..so we just say 2001 cool greys? not OG cool greys LOL
By That Logic, any retro that featured a different color than the original model is not an og retro bred 1s, chicago 2s, metallic 5s from 2011, any infrared 6 retro, varsity red 6s, '11 bordeauxs, steel 10s, etc. C'mon bro it's still an og retro just a variant.the ones released to the public were not the PE. they didn't have concord so they aren't considered a technical OG
White and Varsity Red 6s and Black and Varsity Red 6s are not original colorways. Also the ones you mentioned had different shades of the same color. Royal Blue and Concord are not the same color. Infrared and Infrared 23 are just different shades of Infrared BUT are the same color. The 2011 Black, Bordeaux, and Light Graphite 7s was a variant of the original shoe.By That Logic, any retro that featured a different color than the original model is not an og retro bred 1s, chicago 2s, metallic 5s from 2011, any infrared 6 retro, varsity red 6s, '11 bordeauxs, steel 10s, etc. C'mon bro it's still an og retro just a variant.
what you just said is incorrect, they are all variants.White and Varsity Red 6s and Black and Varsity Red 6s are not original colorways. Also the ones you mentioned had different shades of the same color. Royal Blue and Concord are not the same color. Infrared and Infrared 23 are just different shades of Infrared BUT the same color. The 2011 Black, Bordeaux, and Light Graphite 7s was a variant of the original shoe.