- Jan 19, 2007
- 20,416
- 18,625
Thank god for Container Store. I was never with the ****s in regards to the slide out gimmick boxes.
Air Jordan 11 Retro "Concord" - December 8, 2018 release - $220 #45
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by salacious crumb,
- Start date
Thank god for Container Store. I was never with the ****s in regards to the slide out gimmick boxes.
- Jun 1, 2007
- 9,714
- 3,630
Copping just for the 11s collection. I've always found the 11s looked too chunky for me.
- Aug 11, 2013
- 1,201
- 3,141
I’m gonna pull out some old pairs when i get home and check that out
- Dec 18, 2015
- 18,192
- 27,334
Aquamanjay_
formerly jaylaw15
- Dec 18, 2014
- 8,180
- 9,262
Size 9.5 from DS dan
- Apr 22, 2012
- 85,111
- 113,889
My size 
KanyIZZY
formerly j o 19
- Oct 1, 2004
- 18,654
- 49,520
Those cool blue hue shots are different. Im seeing two different shoes. I prefer the slightly higher PL OG look in the tagged pics to the 01 mid PL look in the cool hue pics.
- Nov 26, 2015
- 24,441
- 22,120
Need to know sizing on these. Went .5 down on Win Like 82s. First 11 mid I’ve owned since 02.
Aquamanjay_
formerly jaylaw15
- Dec 18, 2014
- 8,180
- 9,262
I want to go TTS(10). Hopefully I win in my size. I won one 9.5 in the shadow 1s after over a dozen raffles.
My 2009 jams were 10.5. I forgot how they fit tho
My 2009 jams were 10.5. I forgot how they fit tho
- Jan 7, 2015
- 7,297
- 8,076
They’ll probably fit the same as SJ and Win likes. Imo I would go TTS. I doubled up on Space Jams (half size up and TTS), and half size up was too big.
Aquamanjay_
formerly jaylaw15
- Dec 18, 2014
- 8,180
- 9,262
Imagine if Jordan Brand did all their retros like this. Not 100%, but 90% accuracy. The Black Cement 3, Shadow 1, even the Grape 5, and Black Toe 13 looked so different from the OGs.
- Jul 10, 2003
- 5,786
- 2,483
- Oct 6, 2016
- 10,627
- 23,572
Interesting. On the retro box, the Jumpman is behind the lettering. On the original, the Jumpman is in front. Never noticed that small detail til now.
Imagine if Jordan Brand did all their retros like this. Not 100%, but 90% accuracy. The Black Cement 3, Shadow 1, even the Grape 5, and Black Toe 13 looked so different from the OGs.
- Nov 26, 2015
- 24,441
- 22,120
Imagine if Jordan Brand did all their retros like this. Not 100%, but 90% accuracy. The Black Cement 3, Shadow 1, even the Grape 5, and Black Toe 13 looked so different from the OGs.
Just proves they can, but chose not to.
- Aug 11, 2013
- 1,201
- 3,141
Call it nitpicking if you want but something about the back of this shoe has been bothering me. After homie post that pic earlier of the back of these new joints next to the Jams, I had to go home and investigate.
The PL was wider in the back on the OG, the part of the liner with the 23 on it was also a little wider than what we have been getting. The over all shape of the heel was a lot more strait but it still had a very slight curve to it. When the first retros dropped that curve got a lot more pronounced and they have been similar to that ever since ( I honestly like the curve on the first retros a little better). The PL though was still kind of wide in the back which is the look they are trying to copy with these new Concords. They got the width of the patent leather correct but they went overboard on how straight they made the back of the shoe and definitely F’d up the width of the part of the liner with the “45” on it. The liner part with the 45 is the detail that’s really bothering me honestly. It just looks off.
The PL was wider in the back on the OG, the part of the liner with the 23 on it was also a little wider than what we have been getting. The over all shape of the heel was a lot more strait but it still had a very slight curve to it. When the first retros dropped that curve got a lot more pronounced and they have been similar to that ever since ( I honestly like the curve on the first retros a little better). The PL though was still kind of wide in the back which is the look they are trying to copy with these new Concords. They got the width of the patent leather correct but they went overboard on how straight they made the back of the shoe and definitely F’d up the width of the part of the liner with the “45” on it. The liner part with the 45 is the detail that’s really bothering me honestly. It just looks off.
- Aug 11, 2013
- 1,201
- 3,141
Here’s how the back of the PL was last year a lot closer together. I wish they could’ve just fixed that and left the liner “45” area alone.
Aquamanjay_
formerly jaylaw15
- Dec 18, 2014
- 8,180
- 9,262
Do y’all expect 1000% copies?
- Nov 7, 2014
- 2,715
- 9,059
JRepp23
The "Air Jordan" font, is different, and smaller too. I remember someone pointing the same thing out, in the "Shadow" 10 thread.
- Aug 11, 2013
- 1,201
- 3,141
No, but that liner is extremely off. Is it not ?
- Oct 6, 2016
- 10,627
- 23,572
I really believe there are going to be so many of these made in many different Nike Factories that there will be a few variations of this shoe. I expect to see a lot of subtle differences in them when people start posting up pics after release. We will see.
Last edited:
Aquamanjay_
formerly jaylaw15
- Dec 18, 2014
- 8,180
- 9,262
I took another look at your pics, and you’re right. It almost looks squared off instead of round. It is straight too. I like the curve from the 2000, but idk. That’s what I mean by almost 100%. I don’t think they’re ever going to go angle for angle, cut for cut, width for width.
- Jan 19, 2007
- 20,416
- 18,625
- Jul 18, 2012
- 2,282
- 1,240
- Dec 3, 2013
- 22,344
- 32,538
- Aug 11, 2013
- 1,201
- 3,141
Yeah, I just couldn’t put my finger on what was bothering me about the back of the shoe. With all that said though I’m still extremely happy with the shoe overall. They mostly got the shape and the PL cut spot on. I’m in for at least 1 pair.
