- Jan 16, 2014
- 407
- 83
for $190 ill pass since i still got the previous chi 10s w/o the 45. oh well...
Air Jordan 10 "Chicago" Retro for 2015 feat. #45
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by darkchild21,
- Start date
- Jan 16, 2014
- 407
- 83
ouch. but, hey the 10s got a good shelf life. i gotta pass though since i still had the recent chi 10s. not paying $190 for the #45.Def double up then chillin til chicagos
Sucks it's gonna be $400 for 2 pairs
- Nov 16, 2007
- 428
- 185
I'm in I just need one size 11.
- Oct 26, 2013
- 23,107
- 15,455
FIRE!
X's are killing my Pockets this year!!!
#TeamTEAM #NTCARES
- Feb 29, 2000
- 88,759
- 47,966
I wish these would have just been left the 45 off but i understand what nike is doing. Next time they retro there probably wont be no number then after that they will put 23 on it and so on
- Feb 29, 2000
- 88,759
- 47,966
Also these are supposed to be remastered but why they got the same sloppy job the powder blue x has at the top of the lace loop where the red lining is? Shame on you nike lol
- Oct 24, 2010
- 94,423
- 33,488
I dont care for the #45 honestly. i missed out on last release and obviously these will look and feel better but that price is a killer man. SMH
- Feb 10, 2015
- 118
- 20
these might fit a little better than the last retro. The last retro chicago X was very snug even at TTS. Anybody else notice this on the last chicago X retro ?
- Feb 16, 2014
- 190
- 46
Considering the last retro didnt fit me right and came pre creased out of the box these are a must cop for me, not to mention there closer to the og pair
- Jun 17, 2006
- 44,214
- 2,544
Dunno' if I should double up or jus' cop one. I doubled on Powder's and steels.
Decisions, decisions....
Decisions, decisions....
bravelude
Banned
- Dec 29, 2013
- 7,573
- 1,115
rhey look typical, kids will buy into the gimmick. they lost the prestige. hope they added extra loctite glue, or the sole will become dettached.
- Jan 2, 2009
- 1,492
- 67
actually it was 3 countries
taiwan. jordan faces left
korea. jordan faces each other
china. jordans facing away from each other
- Jun 28, 2013
- 627
- 442
they look really nice here, but not sure I can do another white shoe for $190 again
FIRE!
X's are killing my Pockets this year!!!
#TeamTEAM #NTCARES
- Oct 31, 2014
- 3,438
- 868
Might be in for these, especially after I passed on all the other X's
- Jun 13, 2005
- 3,018
- 1,252
Yeah, that's new to me. Ive never seen a pair of OG's where the right shoe jumpman was facing right. Ive only seen the left shoe jumpman facing right and of course those were the Korea pairs. I cant find any pics for the China pairs. Must be rare.
AWOKEN CHARISMA
formerly monopolize
- May 30, 2013
- 3,523
- 4,963
So far pics dont show much of a difference compared to 2012 Chi Xs.
'Stevesteve' was right, theyre the same as the last go.
A black J-man, 45, and red sock liner doesnt justify a $190 price tag.
With 2 2012 Chi Xs on ice , Ima goahead and pass on these.
May with them Hare 7s might have me come out the pockets. Although I got 2 of them on ice as well.
So unless quality is upped compared to cdp, Ill sit them out too.
'Stevesteve' was right, theyre the same as the last go.
A black J-man, 45, and red sock liner doesnt justify a $190 price tag.
With 2 2012 Chi Xs on ice , Ima goahead and pass on these.
May with them Hare 7s might have me come out the pockets. Although I got 2 of them on ice as well.
So unless quality is upped compared to cdp, Ill sit them out too.
Last edited:
- May 15, 2003
- 56,656
- 65,586
I wish we could have a comparison video.
- Jan 2, 2009
- 1,492
- 67
Yes sir the china version is the hardest to come across these days. taiwan pairs imo are the easiest to find
- Feb 29, 2000
- 88,759
- 47,966
All X's are snug dude even the ogs were
Its those elastic lines on the tongue
Some of my pairs over the years were left in the box and when i opened them the shoe was choking the laces lol
- Feb 29, 2000
- 88,759
- 47,966
If the las x didnt fit you right chances are none will fit you right or you have to go half size up
- Jan 3, 2009
- 13,331
- 11,579
Yeah X's are the only J that I have too go up a full size. If I get them in my size they strangle my feet.
- Jun 7, 2014
- 104
- 35
The midfoot was very tight on the 2012 retro but the length was long as hell even at a half size down. I may be in the monority but i thought the 2012 chicago xs were trash and i very seldom use that word. Xs from 2014 were a huge improvement over the 12 chicago xs. The 2012 looked nice but for me that wasnt enough and i ended up selling both of my deadstock pairs. I even cut the straps off one pair and still they felt way too tight so i gave up on both up them. Imo too many corners were cut on such an amazing colorway and silhouette but this new retro looks very promising. If this pair is anything close or better than the 2014 retros....i will be a happy man
- Aug 14, 2014
- 2,100
- 2,130
crazy cuz i found both 2012 and 2014 xs to be tts just the 2012 is hard to get on but once u get it on its cool. just creases like @#$%. i normally go .5 up on jordans but tens i always get my regular size
- Oct 26, 2004
- 8,091
- 1,125
i cant wait
- Oct 26, 2004
- 8,091
- 1,125
these will not last a day 
