- 1,145
- 358
Yo I'll smack the teeth out that dudes mouth son.
ADIDAS x YEEZY COLLAB OFFICIAL THREAD *2016 thread link 1st page*
- Thread in 'Other Brands' Thread starter Started by xcautionx,
- Start date
- Status
- 277
- 39
^^This, considering the amount we pay on sneakers, that's a small amount.
I guess where all this stems from is that people are going the PM route and are scared to post anything in the fear of lurkers.
- 517
- 283
HAHAHAHAHAHAHHA
- 300
- 32
For those who've copped a pair, do you guys prefer a size that's perfectly fit on your feet or a half size bigger to leave some room? I had the TD in size 8 but feels like the feet were moving around when walking, and now I got PB in both 7.5 and 8. The 7.5 is perfect fit but I feel a lil bit tight, do the 350 get loose over time?
- 238
- 122
im glad my little statement invoke a thoughtful convo full of ideas to make our community better... i love you guys... lol
- 7,705
- 4,940
nah man.
not if it was subscribers only.
and the GOLDEN info that goes around here for free?
$9.99 a month easily AND wed prob all have yeezys.
- 2,823
- 1,047
Yes, they do stretch with wear
- 81
- 25
@bsinsan the shoes run 1/2 size big.
Last edited:
- 585
- 263
I guess it would make sense if you resell, but I keep almost all of my sneakers.
CVO_RN95
formerly shoegamer19
- 1,998
- 549
Same here, I can never resell shoes when I only have one of them. I regret it like crazy just like my Jeters
- 613
- 201
It's really just programming, but it may be a lot of coding and QA testing to see if it works.
THE IDEA:
The same type of restriction set on being able to sell shoes on here could be implemented. A certain amount of posts would work well. An amount of time will not, because you can create an account and let it sit. Getting involved to get something like 300 posts would send some folks away because you actually have to give an effort to gain a level of informational access.
Then the task would be, how do we get them to not see valuable information when posted if they're in the same thread. It can be hidden by a secondary spoiler comment, that only members with a certain amount of comments can open when clicked. BINGO! The assessment would have to go even further by gathering if those comments are post gaining comments built up mainly on shorts posts like
Side note: That $9.99 a month membership is pushing it. Annually sure! Some of us don't buy shoes often due to having kids.
Last edited:
- 457
- 239
What is $120 a year on top of retail compared to paying resell for most of the year?
But obviously that would be contingent on the fact that the $120 a year would greatly increase your chances of successfully obtaining releases at retail.
- 1,352
- 518
Maybe NT should do what strictly supreme does. With yearly new members only and forums blocked for those who don't have accounts will work greatly I believe . Post count requirements can also be thrown in maybe.
- 613
- 201
A paying membership guarantees you nothing, but hope. Folks will still be sour from striking out with the info they were able to get.
- 517
- 283
Glad more people are finally taking this to heart.
- 4,289
- 2,368
Petitions? Changes? Man look at this guy... Let me know if there is a position for me under your campaign haha
Last edited:
- 7,705
- 4,940
i dont resell, i fall victim to it in some cases.
maybe. but you have to admit that at least 500 lurkers were able to get access they wouldnt have from those ATC links.
not to mention the people they sent them to and so on.
i think if it was a closed group the chances of regulars who are privy on how to use such links would have substantially increased their chances.
- 57
- 10
think there were 900+ guests for most of release day
- 613
- 201
A closed group would not work because all you have to do is create an account. Restriction will have to be by post count or reps where folks actually have to put an effort in getting involved. Then members posting would have to hide the info within a spoiler comment that has those restrictions in place. That way, only member with the credentials can open those special spoiler comments. I can see that being an easy fix, as well as a monetary membership. We're about the make the creators of NT rich. I'll take shares now. *birdman handrub*
Last edited:
- 57
- 10
'The fix' you might call it, should be fixed before any type of costing membership is implemented imo - provide something the community is asking for before asking for more from us. I'm sure they're racking up the money in ads already
- 7,705
- 4,940
i like this idea a lot.
plus it would benefit mods because users would be more inclined to use better judgement of what they say in risk of being banned and losing their "credentials".
and for the record i only threw out $9.99 in comparison to what i do pay for monthly, yet use/benefit from significantly less.
- 158
- 20
Getting up! One if the dopest gmaes ive ever played and completed! Ahaha
- 2,407
- 905
Mods, you listening? We trying to start a revolution haha
- 57
- 10
solid chance the mods skip this clusterf*ck of a thread for 99% of the day, probably not seen any of this discussion
- 259
- 78
They're already rich with all the ad revenue. Hopefully they also give back to the members making them rich. One paid forum where I'm a member hosts a free NFL office pool every year where cash prizes are awarded weekly and at the end of the season. Maybe NT can do that too, what's $2000 in prizes every year compared to the ad revenue they must be getting.
- Status
