- 10,592
- 9,106
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2015
Why bc it's new? UM football program right back to elite level bc of their coach and that logo.
adidas Continues to Dominate the Market Vol. nike hold this kevin hart
- 10,635
- 10,993
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2012
I see your ignorance isn't limited to just politics and economics.
- 70,049
- 24,223
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2004
1999-2000 presto
Adidas Ultra boost.
that caged sock design is OLD hat for Nike.
why you think prestos are so massively released now? same way Nike killed Ape force I's with its original is da same way Nike gonna eventually rendering ultra boosts just "meh".
- 53,457
- 21,038
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2009
Because it's a logo of jordan dunking a basketball on a football jersey.
- 22,997
- 27,713
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2012
That logo aint bringing recruits in bruh
- 13,383
- 6,647
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2007
1999-2000 presto
Adidas Ultra boost.
that caged sock design is OLD hat for Nike.
why you think prestos are so massively released now? same way Nike killed Ape force I's with its original is da same way Nike gonna eventually rendering ultra boosts just "meh".
Are the midsoles on those adidas made of styrofoam? :x
Last edited:
swendro
formerly swendro88
- 12,953
- 9,308
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2005
Last season:
mismatched jersey/ tire track crotch stripe hell
this season
Classic look with modern updates.
Football team looks great
Don't have to worry about something like his happening again:
- 5,617
- 3,335
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2015
Michigan and Adidas never made sense
- 10,592
- 9,106
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2015
Bruh you tripping if you don't think these kids love the thought of Jordan brand linked with football.
Not putting it on Oregon level of course but man that logo is big.
Last edited:
- 10,635
- 10,993
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2012
Again your ignorance is on full display. Instead of popping off at the mouth, do a little research on Boost technology. Not only was it invented by NASA, it is superior to anything Nike has ever produced. [emoji]128514[/emoji] @ comparing an old technology like the Presto to Boost. At least you're consistent, always going backwards.Are the midsoles on those adidas made of styrofoam? :x
Last edited:
- 70,049
- 24,223
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2004
1999-2000 presto
Adidas Ultra boost.
that caged sock design is OLD hat for Nike.
why you think prestos are so massively released now? same way Nike killed Ape force I's with its original is da same way Nike gonna eventually rendering ultra boosts just "meh".
Are the midsoles on those adidas made of styrofoam? :x
this da **** they hyping... styrofoam prestos
- 34,622
- 27,964
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2002
I take that as a no.
- 23,007
- 33,685
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2012
- 10,635
- 10,993
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2012
Without a doubt; I wouldn't even be mad if Nike can make something more comfortable though.
- 5,067
- 1,133
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2004
this will be the answer (not the shoe, but the tech). https://www.wired.com/2017/03/nike-zoom-vaporfly-elite/
ZoomX will be better than BOOST.
Last edited:
- 13,383
- 6,647
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2007
Again your ignorance is on full display. Instead of popping off at the mouth, do a little research on Boost technology. Not only was it invented by NASA, it is superior to anything Nike has ever produced. [emoji]128514[/emoji] @ comparing an old technology like the Presto to Boost. At least you're consistent, always going backwards.Are the midsoles on those adidas made of styrofoam? :x
View media item 2362241
I'd rather rock some air monarchs than those nasa styrofoam shoes
- 70,049
- 24,223
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2004
I don't care if jesus himself made water into wine in them styrofoam looking Adidas prestos, Nike designed da presto a decade+ plus before da ultraboost.
Nike designed da presto a decade+ plus before da ultraboost.
- 6,259
- 2,066
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2010
Yea Adidas was trippinLast season:
mismatched jersey/ tire track crotch stripe hell
this season
Classic look with modern updates.
Football team looks great
Don't have to worry about something like his happening again:
- 7,525
- 4,718
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2009
I use to be a Nike stan like most here but then i bought Ultraboosts last year..........
Way better comfort wise than Nike's best lunarlon runners.
Way better comfort wise than Nike's best lunarlon runners.
Last edited:
- 94,325
- 33,370
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2010
I remember when roshes sold for good money.
I just remember the video of lebron claiming them to be the most comfortable shoes ever
Went and copped a pair
Legit thought I got scammed by both bron and Nike
bigj505
Staff member
- 42,582
- 21,771
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2007
I remember when roshes sold for good money.
I just remember the video of lebron claiming them to be the most comfortable shoes ever
Went and copped a pair
Legit thought I got scammed by both bron and Nike
You got scammed B.
I wouldn't doubt adidas has the new comfy juice but I'm perfectly fine with my flyknit maxes. I never have issues with them so I don't need anything better.
- 5,067
- 1,133
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2004
i thought roshes were actually pretty comfortable...especially for a $65 shoe.
- 10,635
- 10,993
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2012
They were, people in here are buggin out if they say otherwise. The Roshe was the most comfortable shoe I had until the original Pure Boost dropped. I personally don't like the aesthetics of the Ultra Boost, so I can't relate to the claim that it's the most comfortable form of Boost tech. I did see those EQT 91/17 and that midsole looks like it would feel like walking on pillows.
- 94,325
- 33,370
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2010
I have absolutely zero reason to lie. Roshes were not comfortable AT ALL. I have more comfort from my retro Jordan 1s and those are solid rubber sole
I do enjoy my air max 90s though. The most recent infrared retro. Those were surprisingly really comfortable
I do enjoy my air max 90s though. The most recent infrared retro. Those were surprisingly really comfortable
Last edited:
