- 851
- 393
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2016
savage
What pants are those with the uncaged? Want to grab a pair for my chick
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
savage
What pants are those with the uncaged? Want to grab a pair for my chick
Did you get the purps? I'm still deciding on the color for the custom.
These just touched down. Great price from Kafka. Glad to finally complete the ZG Knit family.
So cold
What pants are those with the uncaged? Want to grab a pair for my chick
thruuuuuuth!Alphabounce look better than uncaged lol.
What pants are those with the uncaged? Want to grab a pair for my chick
Alphabounce has nothing to do with anything boost related.Alphabounce look better than uncaged lol.
thruuuuuuth!
Make sure you guys get some no shows for these lol
Nah, didn't get the purps, I guess the family is still incomplete haha. They purps are nice but I'd never wear em.Did you get the purps? I'm still deciding on the color for the custom.
You shoulda copped when Sneakerboy had those purples for $140. I woulda never copped those for anywhere near their retail or even with a $75 matches code.
Nah, didn't get the purps, I guess the family is still incomplete haha. They purps are nice but I'd never wear em.
Really like this. Wish I copped the black and whites when I had the chance but $350 or whatever was just too much.
These just touched down. Great price from Kafka. Glad to finally complete the ZG Knit family.
This. Went .5 up on my first pair and that was a huge mistake. Been buying TTS on all UB since and they fit perfect. Will do the same on uncaged
im 10.5 and get all my UB's 10.5
It's because in that pic he's wearing an Alphabounce on his left foot and an Uncaged UB on the right. Opinions on the shoe aside, I feel like that's a legitimate enough reason to bring it up considering it was referring to the pic posted.Alphabounce has nothing to do with anything boost related.Alphabounce look better than uncaged lol.
If they look better to you then by all means save $80 and cop those instead.
Still don't know why those are getting mentioned here. Only thing that relates alphabounce with UBs is the hype.
Yeah they do look pretty good on feet. I think the Armani colorway is the only one I will have though.Alphabounce look better than uncaged lol.
Interesting you say this, I was just thinking about how I feel like 1.0 UBs fit smaller than more recent UBs...Im guessing Im not the only one that thinks this?Originally Posted by 1mfnz
how's the fit though? tts or .5 up? fits like 1.0 or 2.0 ub?
lol how is that a fair comparison if more than half the dude's left foot is covered by his right ankle?
It's because in that pic he's wearing an Alphabounce on his left foot and an Uncaged UB on the right. Opinions on the shoe aside, I feel like that's a legitimate enough reason to bring it up considering it was referring to the pic posted.
Alphabounce has nothing to do with anything boost related.
If they look better to you then by all means save $80 and cop those instead.
Still don't know why those are getting mentioned here. Only thing that relates alphabounce with UBs is the hype.
At first I was going to dye them burgundy or ink blue, but I will probably go black with some type of special treatment on top to get that waxed look like the sample pair.
Nah, didn't get the purps, I guess the family is still incomplete haha. They purps are nice but I'd never wear em.
I would say the 1.0 UBs are more "snug" rather than fit smaller compared to 2.0 knit and UBs with continental soles.
Interesting you say this, I was just thinking about how I feel like 1.0 UBs fit smaller than more recent UBs...Im guessing Im not the only one that thinks this?
I'm a true 9.5, and I bought my OG purples and my Creams in a 10. I know I made the right decisions with my OG purples, but I honestly feel like I could've gone with a 9.5 on the Creams.
Is there a consensus that the more recent UBs fit more TTS vs the OG UBs, which fit small?
You must think resell prices are great deals.It's pic related homegirl.
No such thing as saving money in this forum. Sneakers is all about Disposable income.
Dude said "save" nobody in these parts is saving money
I would say the 1.0 UBs are more "snug" rather than fit smaller compared to 2.0 knit and UBs with continental soles.
My solar reds 3.0 do definitely feel lighter and roomier than some of my 1.0 knits but length-wise all fit the same for me. Only UB I would probably size up would be the core blacks.
i agree. i had tw ub 1.0 in 10.5 and i had to sell them and get a pair at sz 11. so for all my ub 1.0's i have to get 11 but when i picked up a pair of tw and cb 2.0, the toe box definitely feels roomier and i couldve gone with 10.5 but went with 11. the difference is small but it might make a difference if you are actually running in these shoes or not.
Interesting you say this, I was just thinking about how I feel like 1.0 UBs fit smaller than more recent UBs...Im guessing Im not the only one that thinks this?
I'm a true 9.5, and I bought my OG purples and my Creams in a 10. I know I made the right decisions with my OG purples, but I honestly feel like I could've gone with a 9.5 on the Creams.
Is there a consensus that the more recent UBs fit more TTS vs the OG UBs, which fit small?
No 3M! It's just going to be silver gradient T_T
Man, they have a good opportunity to use 3M again with those Olympic silvers....
Yeah, when I first started seeing pics of this pattern I couldn't believe they weren't 3M. They are kinda sparkly though, I don't hate em.
Need these to just drop already...