- 26,023
- 22,986
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2013
While watching the press conference of the female that slept with Chris Brown but did not get herpes, I started thinking, if this female has a legitimate case so do a lot of fathers out there.
Actually when putting things into perspective a lot of fathers have a better chance on suing females that tricked them into getting pregnant.
For example, if a married woman steps out of a relationship and lies about being single and gets pregnant by another Man, how is that not fraud? Why are the court penalizing the victim which in this case is the father? The woman clearly slept with intent on getting pregnant to collect a monthly paycheck for 18-21 years.
That's fraud and grand larceny....
All the woman that claimed to be on the pill, can't conceive, etc just to tide the man into a relationship or child support should be she. I don't think the man is relieve of their fatherly duties but the woman should be paying the person back.
What ya think?
Actually when putting things into perspective a lot of fathers have a better chance on suing females that tricked them into getting pregnant.
For example, if a married woman steps out of a relationship and lies about being single and gets pregnant by another Man, how is that not fraud? Why are the court penalizing the victim which in this case is the father? The woman clearly slept with intent on getting pregnant to collect a monthly paycheck for 18-21 years.
That's fraud and grand larceny....
All the woman that claimed to be on the pill, can't conceive, etc just to tide the man into a relationship or child support should be she. I don't think the man is relieve of their fatherly duties but the woman should be paying the person back.
What ya think?