- 3,063
- 249
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2007
/thread
Sheesh
Sheesh
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
http://www.cs.utah.edu/~zachary/isp/worksheets/operprec/operprec.htmlOriginally Posted by usainboltisfast
Speaking of parentheses, you can override Maple's precedence rules by using parentheses to group expressions in the order that you wish Maple to evaluate them. Here are some examples where we use parentheses to force a different evaluation order than Maple would otherwise use.
> 2*(3+4);
> 2^(3*4);
> 2/(3/3);
If you have any doubt, use parentheses to make usre Maple executes your expressions in the order in which you intend.
Originally Posted by usainboltisfast
Where exactly did you read that the division symbol = fraction?
http://www.cs.utah.edu/~zachary/isp/worksheets/operprec/operprec.htmlOriginally Posted by usainboltisfast
Speaking of parentheses, you can override Maple's precedence rules by using parentheses to group expressions in the order that you wish Maple to evaluate them. Here are some examples where we use parentheses to force a different evaluation order than Maple would otherwise use.
> 2*(3+4);
> 2^(3*4);
> 2/(3/3);
If you have any doubt, use parentheses to make usre Maple executes your expressions in the order in which you intend.
Originally Posted by usainboltisfast
Where exactly did you read that the division symbol = fraction?
Doesn't prove anything. It clearly says "TO FORCE A DIFFERENT EVALUATION ORDER."Originally Posted by kingcrux31
http://www.cs.utah.edu/~zachary/isp/worksheets/operprec/operprec.htmlOriginally Posted by usainboltisfast
Speaking of parentheses, you can override Maple's precedence rules by using parentheses to group expressions in the order that you wish Maple to evaluate them. Here are some examples where we use parentheses to force a different evaluation order than Maple would otherwise use.
> 2*(3+4);
> 2^(3*4);
> 2/(3/3);
If you have any doubt, use parentheses to make usre Maple executes your expressions in the order in which you intend.
Again here is more proof that state the term 2(12) needs another set of parenthesis if they are to be done before division.
Doesn't prove anything. It clearly says "TO FORCE A DIFFERENT EVALUATION ORDER."Originally Posted by kingcrux31
http://www.cs.utah.edu/~zachary/isp/worksheets/operprec/operprec.htmlOriginally Posted by usainboltisfast
Speaking of parentheses, you can override Maple's precedence rules by using parentheses to group expressions in the order that you wish Maple to evaluate them. Here are some examples where we use parentheses to force a different evaluation order than Maple would otherwise use.
> 2*(3+4);
> 2^(3*4);
> 2/(3/3);
If you have any doubt, use parentheses to make usre Maple executes your expressions in the order in which you intend.
Again here is more proof that state the term 2(12) needs another set of parenthesis if they are to be done before division.
Originally Posted by seasoned vet
http://www.cs.utah.edu/~zachary/isp/worksheets/operprec/operprec.htmlOriginally Posted by usainboltisfast
Speaking of parentheses, you can override Maple's precedence rules by using parentheses to group expressions in the order that you wish Maple to evaluate them. Here are some examples where we use parentheses to force a different evaluation order than Maple would otherwise use.
> 2*(3+4);
> 2^(3*4);
> 2/(3/3);
If you have any doubt, use parentheses to make usre Maple executes your expressions in the order in which you intend.
Again here is more proof that state the term 2(12) needs another set of parenthesis if they are to be done before division.
Originally Posted by usainboltisfast
Where exactly did you read that the division symbol = fraction?
Originally Posted by seasoned vet
http://www.cs.utah.edu/~zachary/isp/worksheets/operprec/operprec.htmlOriginally Posted by usainboltisfast
Speaking of parentheses, you can override Maple's precedence rules by using parentheses to group expressions in the order that you wish Maple to evaluate them. Here are some examples where we use parentheses to force a different evaluation order than Maple would otherwise use.
> 2*(3+4);
> 2^(3*4);
> 2/(3/3);
If you have any doubt, use parentheses to make usre Maple executes your expressions in the order in which you intend.
Again here is more proof that state the term 2(12) needs another set of parenthesis if they are to be done before division.
Originally Posted by usainboltisfast
Where exactly did you read that the division symbol = fraction?
Okay Shakespeare.Originally Posted by usainboltisfast
Originally Posted by kingcrux31
Doesn't prove anything. It clearly says "TO FORCE A DIFFERENT EVALUATION ORDER."Originally Posted by usainboltisfast
http://www.cs.utah.edu/~zachary/isp/worksheets/operprec/operprec.html
Again here is more proof that state the term 2(12) needs another set of parenthesis if they are to be done before division.
Do you even understand the stuff you read online?
My goodness.
I understand English isn't your first language but you fail at reading you didn't even copy the whole sentence. The only way you can force an equation out of it's normal order of operations is by adding parenthesis.
You still think 48/2(12) is the same 48/(2(12))
Okay Shakespeare.Originally Posted by usainboltisfast
Originally Posted by kingcrux31
Doesn't prove anything. It clearly says "TO FORCE A DIFFERENT EVALUATION ORDER."Originally Posted by usainboltisfast
http://www.cs.utah.edu/~zachary/isp/worksheets/operprec/operprec.html
Again here is more proof that state the term 2(12) needs another set of parenthesis if they are to be done before division.
Do you even understand the stuff you read online?
My goodness.
I understand English isn't your first language but you fail at reading you didn't even copy the whole sentence. The only way you can force an equation out of it's normal order of operations is by adding parenthesis.
You still think 48/2(12) is the same 48/(2(12))
When did I say that? The original problem is 48÷2(9+3), NOT 48/2(12).Originally Posted by kingcrux31
Okay Shakespeare.Originally Posted by usainboltisfast
Originally Posted by kingcrux31
Doesn't prove anything. It clearly says "TO FORCE A DIFFERENT EVALUATION ORDER."
Do you even understand the stuff you read online?
My goodness.
I understand English isn't your first language but you fail at reading you didn't even copy the whole sentence. The only way you can force an equation out of it's normal order of operations is by adding parenthesis.
You still think 48/2(12) is the same 48/(2(12))
When did I say that? The original problem is 48÷2(9+3), NOT 48/2(12).Originally Posted by kingcrux31
Okay Shakespeare.Originally Posted by usainboltisfast
Originally Posted by kingcrux31
Doesn't prove anything. It clearly says "TO FORCE A DIFFERENT EVALUATION ORDER."
Do you even understand the stuff you read online?
My goodness.
I understand English isn't your first language but you fail at reading you didn't even copy the whole sentence. The only way you can force an equation out of it's normal order of operations is by adding parenthesis.
You still think 48/2(12) is the same 48/(2(12))
Again!Originally Posted by usainboltisfast
Originally Posted by seasoned vet
Originally Posted by usainboltisfast
http://www.cs.utah.edu/~zachary/isp/worksheets/operprec/operprec.html
Again here is more proof that state the term 2(12) needs another set of parenthesis if they are to be done before division.
- but......
Originally Posted by usainboltisfast
Where exactly did you read that the division symbol = fraction?
- though.
Let me guess you think the division symbol is the same as the fraction bar. The division in this problemsays you are dividing 48 into the next term to the right of it not divding into ALL the terms to the right of it
Again!Originally Posted by usainboltisfast
Originally Posted by seasoned vet
Originally Posted by usainboltisfast
http://www.cs.utah.edu/~zachary/isp/worksheets/operprec/operprec.html
Again here is more proof that state the term 2(12) needs another set of parenthesis if they are to be done before division.
- but......
Originally Posted by usainboltisfast
Where exactly did you read that the division symbol = fraction?
- though.
Let me guess you think the division symbol is the same as the fraction bar. The division in this problemsays you are dividing 48 into the next term to the right of it not divding into ALL the terms to the right of it