- 9,015
- 5,581
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2005
I've asked 10 people and they all said 288.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Show proof then.Originally Posted by snakeyes17
Oh I'm sorry let's disregard the greatest computer innovation of 2009 according to Popular Science.Originally Posted by BC2310
I do not trust the german site and it's feasible that any math software would use both signs interchangeably which is incorrect.Originally Posted by NikeVandal
COMPUTATIONAL KNOWLEDGE ENGINE > My ALGEBRA
youre trying to tell me your toyota corolla is better than my ferrari
Unfortunately the og division symbol is so old and played out it has little relevance today, until some trolling genius came up with this poorly written 'simple' equation.
Why do you think it's written that way everywhere? and not with / ? with / it's 288 with the og division symbol it's 2.
let's be real U Mad b/c I made fun of your all cap know it all message board style
I'm sure this website running on over 10,000 computers is sure to get the wrong answer to a simple algebra problem.
And it gets 288 if you use ÷ or / in the problem.
But let's go with a no name website myalgebra.com....yeah.
Originally Posted by ThunderChunk69
Thank you MathGodOriginally Posted by Klipschorn
TEAM288 REPRESENT.
hope this lulls Crux to sleep
also, smh at not knowing the other night, was sleepy
This is correct. Distribution is a function of multiplication. You must perform division first in this problem.
Actually, you're wrong.Originally Posted by kingcrux31
Distributing a number NOT DIRECTLY ATTACHED to ( ) is WRONG.Originally Posted by ThunderChunk69
Thank you MathGod
hope this lulls Crux to sleep
also, smh at not knowing the other night, was sleepy
It's becoming more and more evident how many of you don't know what you're talking about.
But I could predict your response would just be "Troll" .......
Show proof then.Originally Posted by snakeyes17
Oh I'm sorry let's disregard the greatest computer innovation of 2009 according to Popular Science.Originally Posted by BC2310
I do not trust the german site and it's feasible that any math software would use both signs interchangeably which is incorrect.Originally Posted by NikeVandal
COMPUTATIONAL KNOWLEDGE ENGINE > My ALGEBRA
youre trying to tell me your toyota corolla is better than my ferrari
Unfortunately the og division symbol is so old and played out it has little relevance today, until some trolling genius came up with this poorly written 'simple' equation.
Why do you think it's written that way everywhere? and not with / ? with / it's 288 with the og division symbol it's 2.
let's be real U Mad b/c I made fun of your all cap know it all message board style
I'm sure this website running on over 10,000 computers is sure to get the wrong answer to a simple algebra problem.
And it gets 288 if you use ÷ or / in the problem.
But let's go with a no name website myalgebra.com....yeah.
Originally Posted by ThunderChunk69
Thank you MathGodOriginally Posted by Klipschorn
TEAM288 REPRESENT.
hope this lulls Crux to sleep
also, smh at not knowing the other night, was sleepy
This is correct. Distribution is a function of multiplication. You must perform division first in this problem.
Actually, you're wrong.Originally Posted by kingcrux31
Distributing a number NOT DIRECTLY ATTACHED to ( ) is WRONG.Originally Posted by ThunderChunk69
Thank you MathGod
hope this lulls Crux to sleep
also, smh at not knowing the other night, was sleepy
It's becoming more and more evident how many of you don't know what you're talking about.
But I could predict your response would just be "Troll" .......
Exactly..Originally Posted by franchise3
Team 2 and Team 288, to quote the great Jay-Z:
'A wise man told me not to argue with fools, because people from a distance, can't tell who is who'
Point is, it's getting pointless. Nobody is changing anybody's minds. It's time to move on
Exactly..Originally Posted by franchise3
Team 2 and Team 288, to quote the great Jay-Z:
'A wise man told me not to argue with fools, because people from a distance, can't tell who is who'
Point is, it's getting pointless. Nobody is changing anybody's minds. It's time to move on
Originally Posted by snakeyes17
Oh I'm sorry let's disregard the greatest computer innovation of 2009 according to Popular Science.Originally Posted by BC2310
I do not trust the german site and it's feasible that any math software would use both signs interchangeably which is incorrect.Originally Posted by NikeVandal
COMPUTATIONAL KNOWLEDGE ENGINE > My ALGEBRA
youre trying to tell me your toyota corolla is better than my ferrari
Unfortunately the og division symbol is so old and played out it has little relevance today, until some trolling genius came up with this poorly written 'simple' equation.
Why do you think it's written that way everywhere? and not with / ? with / it's 288 with the og division symbol it's 2.
let's be real U Mad b/c I made fun of your all cap know it all message board style
I'm sure this website running on over 10,000 computers is sure to get the wrong answer to a simple algebra problem.
And it gets 288 if you use ÷ or / in the problem.
But let's go with a no name website myalgebra.com....yeah.
Originally Posted by snakeyes17
Oh I'm sorry let's disregard the greatest computer innovation of 2009 according to Popular Science.Originally Posted by BC2310
I do not trust the german site and it's feasible that any math software would use both signs interchangeably which is incorrect.Originally Posted by NikeVandal
COMPUTATIONAL KNOWLEDGE ENGINE > My ALGEBRA
youre trying to tell me your toyota corolla is better than my ferrari
Unfortunately the og division symbol is so old and played out it has little relevance today, until some trolling genius came up with this poorly written 'simple' equation.
Why do you think it's written that way everywhere? and not with / ? with / it's 288 with the og division symbol it's 2.
let's be real U Mad b/c I made fun of your all cap know it all message board style
I'm sure this website running on over 10,000 computers is sure to get the wrong answer to a simple algebra problem.
And it gets 288 if you use ÷ or / in the problem.
But let's go with a no name website myalgebra.com....yeah.
Where exactly did you read that the division symbol = fraction?Originally Posted by kingcrux31
Showing your solution on paper > Wolfram, Google and your fancy calculator combined.
288 is wrong because the original problem shows 2(9+3), NOT 48(9+3).
Where exactly did you read that the division symbol = fraction?Originally Posted by kingcrux31
Showing your solution on paper > Wolfram, Google and your fancy calculator combined.
288 is wrong because the original problem shows 2(9+3), NOT 48(9+3).
Originally Posted by usainboltisfast
Originally Posted by kingcrux31
Showing your solution on paper > Wolfram, Google and your fancy calculator combined.
288 is wrong because the original problem shows 2(9+3), NOT 48(9+3).
Where exactly did you read that the division symbol = fraction?
Originally Posted by usainboltisfast
Originally Posted by kingcrux31
Showing your solution on paper > Wolfram, Google and your fancy calculator combined.
288 is wrong because the original problem shows 2(9+3), NOT 48(9+3).
Where exactly did you read that the division symbol = fraction?
Originally Posted by usainboltisfast
Where exactly did you read that the division symbol = fraction?Originally Posted by kingcrux31
Showing your solution on paper > Wolfram, Google and your fancy calculator combined.
288 is wrong because the original problem shows 2(9+3), NOT 48(9+3).
Originally Posted by usainboltisfast
Where exactly did you read that the division symbol = fraction?Originally Posted by kingcrux31
Showing your solution on paper > Wolfram, Google and your fancy calculator combined.
288 is wrong because the original problem shows 2(9+3), NOT 48(9+3).
Originally Posted by usainboltisfast
Where exactly did you read that the division symbol = fraction?Originally Posted by kingcrux31
Showing your solution on paper > Wolfram, Google and your fancy calculator combined.
288 is wrong because the original problem shows 2(9+3), NOT 48(9+3).
Originally Posted by usainboltisfast
Where exactly did you read that the division symbol = fraction?Originally Posted by kingcrux31
Showing your solution on paper > Wolfram, Google and your fancy calculator combined.
288 is wrong because the original problem shows 2(9+3), NOT 48(9+3).
You can't even comprehend what has been said.Originally Posted by kingcrux31
Show proof then.
That's right. You can't because what I stated is a fact.
You distribute 48 instead of 2? Worst explanation for 288.
Again, you should remove yourself from this conversation if you're only posting 288 because Wolfram Alpha, Google and your calculator gave you 288.
You can't even comprehend what has been said.Originally Posted by kingcrux31
Show proof then.
That's right. You can't because what I stated is a fact.
You distribute 48 instead of 2? Worst explanation for 288.
Again, you should remove yourself from this conversation if you're only posting 288 because Wolfram Alpha, Google and your calculator gave you 288.
Originally Posted by usainboltisfast
Where exactly did you read that the division symbol = fraction?Originally Posted by kingcrux31
Showing your solution on paper > Wolfram, Google and your fancy calculator combined.
288 is wrong because the original problem shows 2(9+3), NOT 48(9+3).
Originally Posted by usainboltisfast
Where exactly did you read that the division symbol = fraction?Originally Posted by kingcrux31
Showing your solution on paper > Wolfram, Google and your fancy calculator combined.
288 is wrong because the original problem shows 2(9+3), NOT 48(9+3).