- Apr 5, 2008
- 8,858
- 600
Yezzir. Already got mines, jus waiting on 3D Broadcasts.
3-D Televisions are coming out this week Vol. HDTV's =old technology LOL smh
- Thread in 'General' Thread starter Started by sean c0mbs,
- Start date
- Nov 4, 2003
- 29,630
- 1,863
same. If they could make it without glasses I'll give it a shot. avatar looked cool enough for me to give it a chance
- Nov 22, 2007
- 4,756
- 12
Another note, I wish companies would focus on HD and making sure everything is in HD before moving to 3D...
There are a lot of quality issues with some of the mainstream sets right now they should address as well.
Like Sharp's banding, Sony's clouding, and Samsung's response time.
As for plasma, I wish Samsung and Panasonic would come out and put to rest many of the myths of this superior tech compared to LCD/LED where they are trying tomask their faults.
For Panasonic, I think they'll introduce something along the lines of Pioneer tech, Kuro, since they purchased the rights recently.
There are a lot of quality issues with some of the mainstream sets right now they should address as well.
Like Sharp's banding, Sony's clouding, and Samsung's response time.
As for plasma, I wish Samsung and Panasonic would come out and put to rest many of the myths of this superior tech compared to LCD/LED where they are trying tomask their faults.
For Panasonic, I think they'll introduce something along the lines of Pioneer tech, Kuro, since they purchased the rights recently.
- Oct 28, 2007
- 13,386
- 6,664
This
- Jul 9, 2008
- 2,390
- 17
2010 Firmware Update Will Bring 3D TV Support to All PS3 Games
- Apr 20, 2003
- 1,546
- 10
^^ yup yup can't wait to play God of War 3 in 3D
- Nov 10, 2007
- 9,134
- 1,012
the whole concept of stereoscopic 3d without glasses is pretty difficult to understand at times, stereoscopic 3d is about creating 2 separate viewpoints foreach of your eyes to create depth and without something (glasses) to separate those viewpoints, what youre mostly going to see is a mess
there are prototypes out there of 3d tvs without glasses, but they all have their disadvantages, especially in terms of consumer technology, some of themrequire you to sit at a specific location in relation to your tv (which glasses dont), some of 3d tvs cant even show you 2d properly which would not sell atall today unlike shutter based
companies out there are trying to solve these problems but definitely not at affordable prices within todays market
there are prototypes out there of 3d tvs without glasses, but they all have their disadvantages, especially in terms of consumer technology, some of themrequire you to sit at a specific location in relation to your tv (which glasses dont), some of 3d tvs cant even show you 2d properly which would not sell atall today unlike shutter based
companies out there are trying to solve these problems but definitely not at affordable prices within todays market
- Jan 12, 2003
- 21,951
- 1,398
gimmick.
- Nov 22, 2007
- 4,756
- 12
[h4][/h4]
[h4]Cowboys Stadium 3D scoreboard experiment doesn't go so well, turned off in less than seven minutes[/h4]
By Nilay Patelposted Dec 14th 2009 1:01PM
You know 3D has a long way to go when even Jerry Jones can't manage to sell it for longer than seven minutes: the vaunted real-time 3D scoreboard display experiment at last night's Cowboys game was turned off to loud cheers after just six minutes and fifty seconds of being active. The problem, as usual, was glasses: most of the 80,000 people in attendance didn't bother to put on the headgear required to see the 3D effect, and instead saw a blurry anaglyph image -- which they then booed. What's more, some who wore the glasses complained that the 3D effect caused nausea, although probably not as badly as the Cowboys' 20-17 loss to the Chargers. HDlogix actually has the tech to do glasses-free 3D, but it simply doesn't work when scaled up for the world's largest HD monitor -- a problem they'll have plenty of time to solve when the Cowboys fail to make the playoffs with another couple December losses.
- May 5, 2009
- 12,536
- 39
3-D is so 80s
- Nov 8, 2007
- 9,981
- 28
- Jun 12, 2002
- 684
- 10
I think this will die fast
- Apr 4, 2007
- 11,513
- 51
- Dec 30, 2008
- 7,137
- 481
I don't see the appeal of 3D. That many people really care about 3d tv?
If it makes the prices of other flatscreens go down though I'm all for it.
If it makes the prices of other flatscreens go down though I'm all for it.
- Mar 7, 2007
- 15,468
- 4,704
It's still in the early stages
- Oct 13, 2008
- 1,189
- 10
i'll wait until it gets fully developed
- Jan 2, 2010
- 7,615
- 1,012
this is stupid... i dont get how the tv is 3d... dont u need 3d programming? and 3-d glasses... if so then how is the tv itself 3-d?
- Nov 10, 2007
- 9,134
- 1,012
these are 2d tvs that are capable of displaying stereoscopic 3d, done through either shutter-based lenses or polarized lenses, youre thinking a holograph
- Apr 22, 2007
- 8,306
- 725
was gonna say the exact same thing.Originally Posted by westcoastsfinest
3-D is so 80s
- Oct 16, 2007
- 1,397
- 10
Forget this, I'm waiting till I can smell through the television.
I'm gonna be on the Food Channel all day long
I'm gonna be on the Food Channel all day long
- Aug 18, 2003
- 1,513
- 18
Im not wearing glasses too watch tv.
Leave to the movies.
Leave to the movies.
- Nov 3, 2007
- 945
- 10
Its pointless and seems like a gimmick to me. But if it forces the prices of regular HDtv's down then I'm with it.
- Feb 16, 2009
- 2,619
- 11
*#*% that give me smell-o-vision.
- Nov 10, 2007
- 9,134
- 1,012
its most likely the case that nothing about 3d capable tvs is going to drive down the prices of regular hdtvs, 3d tvs are more expensive to make and aredefinitely going to cost more
although costing more, it could also be possible that regular hd tvs are going to seem overpriced compared to 3d hdtvs from a value standpoint
although costing more, it could also be possible that regular hd tvs are going to seem overpriced compared to 3d hdtvs from a value standpoint
- Jul 16, 2002
- 30,792
- 5,800
