- Mar 31, 2011
- 73,068
- 117,379
Why take DSJ2.0 when you already have the original?If Knicks took him or JA at 3 I’m completely fine with it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why take DSJ2.0 when you already have the original?If Knicks took him or JA at 3 I’m completely fine with it.
You were sold on JJJ when he got in foul trouble every game and Izzo had no idea how to use him?
Look again. Finger slipped and accidentally hit post.Hope that’s you agreeing B Sox lol
Look again. Finger slipped and accidentally hit post.
Cam would be fine for the Knicks though.
I think you already said it.Whats Cam's worst case scenario?
can handle, semi defend, and shoot wildly inconsistent?
He fouled too much.Wasn't Jaren Jackson playing like 18 MPG?
He was the textbook definition of drafting for potential. I thought he'd need more time but he's been an impact player almost instantly.
Not really sure if I’m loving having both Ja and DSJ on the same roster. Especially when your FA targets consist of several other high usage type players.Shooting 34% from 3 and 81 from FT? Look good for the next level.
Jarrett Culver has to be the pick if we fall to #3 or worse
If we land the big fishes we are probably better off trading the pick
Lol why you editing your posts my man? You funny.
I cant add a sentence now?
Gotta chill on that refresh button buddy.
Not too invested in this draft as I was in past drafts. Only care about potential future Knicks.